Goldman Sachs predicts 2.4 % growth next quarterHmm difficult to know what Ccb means when he says long term but mentions revist in 1 year .
I have already crystal balled recession and double digit inflation within that time period . I can add there is a risk of double digit unemployment .
So I don't regard that as fine .
Without elections; how does that work? Oh they can't have elections because of the war. Funny we had elections during the civil war but who caresA positive for the West is Uke's are actively fighting for a democratic future .
Well, that was a few days ago and their tune has changed slightly since the US-UK tariff deal. Their chief economist is giving the likelihood of a US recession a 45% probability now. I'd expect their forecast will change once again. And, of course, you can't just take what one person or institution says as the only source of truth. MANY economists and institutions have far gloomier predictions. We each have to do our own research and reading and understand why they're saying what they're saying. Don't just read the headlines. That approach is pure confirmation bias on full display.Goldman Sachs predicts 2.4 % growth next quarter
Yes. It's hard to find a better example than insisting that a disparity in trade between two countries is indicative of someone being "ripped off". Insisting that the exporter will pay the tariff, rather than the consumer, is another. He's shown a complete inability to make sense of global trade implications and the health of the US market as a result. Yes, economically illiterate.Economically illiterate?
They may be sharp but they also believe they can direct better market outcomes than a free market can. We typically call that socialism, btw.Somehow not only do I not see that but Bessent, Lutkin and Hasset seem pretty sharp to me.
Agreed. Which is why I say do your own research and reading. Don't just hitch your wagon to the party line, which is exactly what people are doing. Mostly because they don't want to believe that the party they support might be wrong about something.I still remember Paul Klugman, Nobel winning economist who said in 2016 if Trump won the market would crash so economist predicting gloom is taken with a grain of salt.
Virtually all of our clients right now have stopped spending. My business and many others are already seeing the effects. Clients have money to spend and, in fact, they need to spend - they can't just keep cash in the bank - but they won't because it's not penciling out and they don't know what's around the corner.Tell me how has your life been affected by the illiterate?
Illegal immigrants cost the state of California 3.5 billion dollars for Medical alone!As a percentage, undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than citizens. Undocumented immigrants help improve our economy - make up 25% of farm workers; 19% of maintenance and housekeeping services; 17% of construction workers; and 12% of food workers. In addition, they paid in excess of $10 billion in income taxes. $10 billion in property taxes, and $8 billion in sales taxes in addition to paying into Social Security without ever receiving benefits.
So do the math. Deduct that cost (and it's actually probably even higher than that) from the economic gain that you conveniently dismissed and the number is positive. By a very wide margin. So...sure...you can reduce the expense of healthcare for undocumented immigrants and, at the same time, give up the, literally, hundreds of billions of dollars they contribute to the economy.Illegal immigrants cost the state of California 3.5 billion dollars for Medical alone!
I remember the days when Republicans called the Democrats socialists. Now both parties embrace it!President Trump takes on 'Big Pharma' by signing an executive order to lower drug prices.
The U.S. "will no longer tolerate profiteering and price gouging from Big Pharma" as he signed an executive order implementing what his administration is calling "most favored nations drug pricing."

