Most of these theories are in your head. World war 3 ain't happening yet. The world ain't gonna end. Just shut up and enjoy life before the aliens come down to earth and enslave us all.
Could somebody please summarise for me what The Prince is or what philosophies it represents?
Wikipedia confused me.
Total_Honesty;310661[B said:]Most of these theories are in your head. World war 3 ain't happening yet. The world ain't gonna end. Just shut up and enjoy life before the aliens come down to earth and enslave us al[/B]l.
I think the man himself describes his politics perfectly:That Machiavelli is a right bugger. Diabolical. The Prince was suppose to be for politics, but it has moved into everyday life. Lot's of the way things are done you would be surprised to find out that it was put forth by Machiavelli. I don't have the words to describe how sinister his philosophy is.
that gives me time to reach my pe goals
Some argue that The Prince is so extreme in its views and so divergent from its predecessors that it was actually intended to be satirical in nature.The Prince (in HTML here) is basically a theory of power, control and how to rule. Have a look at the table of contents linked there for an overview.
Summarily, Machiavelli asserts that a great ruler is powerful and feared rather than benevolent and kind, although the appearance of benevolence is important so as to instil patriotism. As such, a kingdom (or principality) is best served by strength rather than compassion. Hence the word "Machiavellian" which refers to a heartless exhibition of self-serving power, supposedly, but not necessarily to the benefit of its subject.
The sparknotes are pretty concise.
I would also note that since its publication in the 16th century, Italy has not been known for its great empire.
I don't trust Fox News. Murdoch is a nasty piece of work. Pay attention to the language they use. It's very easy for a person or organisation for whom communication is their business to suggest things without necessarily declaring them as fact. Omission of critical information and bias can be immensely powerful without necessarily being an outright lie. And they can always brush off BS as opinion.
Don't forget, scandal sells papers and advertising space.
I dont think Fox news are alone in this by any means. The news media in general is constantly under investigation, and they do lie. As it happens there's a mobile phone tapping scandal going on in the UK right now, where many people are being fined and losing their jobs in the media for snooping on celebrities (probably among others). That's about listening in on calls though, not remotely activating the microphone and transmitter.
According to the article, which seems significantly better researched and presented, the technique of activiating the microphone and the transmitter whilst not on a call requires third party software installed on the device. This I can believe, no problem. It's a wholly different proposition from saying the FBI can simply listen to your phone's microphone. See "omission of critical information" above. Of course this would also appear on the phone user's bill, presumably as data charges.
I said it up before and I'll say it again. Don't trust the media, and if you must watch the news, please read or watch a number of reports on the same story from different sources and research things that are opinion-forming. Otherwise you get things happening like we had here a few years ago where paediatricians were targeted by angry hate mobs, getting their windows smashed, threatened, and if I recall correctly, beaten up too.
God bless Texas.Im from Texas... We have guns big enough to defend ourselves.. Nuff said ;; p
Well if the world is going to end does anyone know where I should park my car?

