Ultimate Burrito
Moderator, Member of the Month Oct 2017, PEGym He
I am not sure what or who I am legend is
It's a zombie Apocalypse movie
I am not sure what or who I am legend is
Most all flu originate in east and southeast Asia. In China flu season begins in October and a number of months later begin appearing in America South America and Europe. Much due to easy travel thru air traffic. In 2020 the lockdowns in Asia the mask wearing and everything else done including restricted travel tamped down the flu. Unfortunately the monster that is the continuing Covid pandemic had already escaped. What happened in Asia with the flu shows that masks and social distancing works. Countries that are all in on preventive measures like much of Asia Australia and New Zealand are fairing much better than the country who are still fight over the right thing to do even with over 2000000 dead world wide. Until everyone has been touch by person tragedy the resistance to preventive measures will continue. I don't need a family member to die to know that wearing a mask is such a small thing to do for such great good and safety.It's disingenuous to say that a decline in flu cases was a result steps taken to prevent the spread of Covid without asking why there was also a decline where those steps weren't taken. Influenzas and non SARS-CoV-2 coronaviruses virtually fell off the map in Sweden (notorious for remaining open) and just about everywhere, really. The public health data shows no correlation between lockdowns/masks and a decline in the flu (or stopping the spread of Covid, but that's already been said).
I have not seen any evidence to the contrary from JAMA WHO CDC. Yes there are non scientific sites with a political bent that present pseudo science arguments. Yes Fauci is a public figure and often asked to be interviewed and lucky for those who have ears to hear that he can be that voice of reason so lacking in public discourse.The problem with that is the blatant disregard for science. Fauci loves to have the microphone and plays to the media. It seems you're willing to believe everything he says despite evidence to the contrary.
Clever!
The point is that there are places considered "successful" where harsh restrictions weren't in force. People only want to copy the successful places that enforced interventions and ignore the fact that there is no correlation. Another example: In the US we have North and South Dakota - similar climate and population densities. When ND enforced a mask mandate, their mortality rate climbed. At the very same time, SD with no mask mandate saw their mortality rate decline.
I also don't believe success should be measured by Covid - public health has many more variables than simply one virus - but that's another topic.
And many other scientists contradict him (not to mention the numerous times he contradicted himself) so he is far from the be-all, end-all voice in the discussion. I examine the quality of the source every time and have posted repeatedly where "this other info" is coming from.Umm isn't Fauci the head medical guy who has the most up to date knowledge . So far as I understand he presents the same message as other leading medical authorities .
I don't know where you are geting this other info but I would examine the quality of the source.
About the same as Taiwan, who hasn't implemented lockdowns. You're missing the point. The data shows no correlation between non-pharmaceutical interventions and "success". Cherry-picking countries who have done well to use as examples while ignoring places that have implemented the same measures and not done well and places that have implemented no measures and done just as well is not science.Nowhere in the US should be considered a success..
My home state of Queensland has had 6 covid deaths the Nothern Territory has had none.
Data doesn't have a political bent. You're simply following the big-tech model and have determined that anything that goes against your adopted narrative is false.I have not seen any evidence to the contrary from JAMA WHO CDC. Yes there are non scientific sites with a political bent that present pseudo science arguments. Yes Fauci is a public figure and often asked to be interviewed and lucky for those who have ears to hear that he can be that voice of reason so lacking in public discourse.
Airlines have the right to tell their passengers what's allowed and not (gov't shouldn't even intervene) and seatbelt laws are an infringement on personal freedom that you're apparently willing to enforce on others.Bottom line on the mask and 6 foot social distance discussion for me. Lets say that JAMA, WHO, CDC and all the highest ranking Public Health officials have gotten together to pull the wool over our mouths for completely bogus reasons. Well if I follow that information worse case scenario I look silly wearing a mask and keeping my distance from people in public setting, but at least I am not complicit in putting myself or others in potentially deadly danger. Best case scenario I keep myself and others safe and participate in the communal good without losing any of my freedoms (remember we can't smoke on planes and have to wear seatbelts by law and people do that).
Of course you can do what you like. As I've said, when people are uncomfortable without me in a mask, I put one on. In fact, I ask them if they would like me to, despite the fact that they're just for show. But when they start being mandated and people are believing in their effectiveness despite the evidence, that's just blind ignorance.Now lets say I believe the blogger sites and push the message that masks are unproven for safety of self and others. Up side I get lucky and don't get sick or maybe just end up asymptomatic and I am complicit in getting others sick. Worse case scenario I get sick maybe die and others get sick maybe die.
Tough choice but I chose the one that I just look silly if I am wrong and don't kill myself or others. But that is just me.

