How long before Zelenski disappears? My bet he'll be 'gone" by the end of the week.
"People like Putin and Trudeau watch what others get away with and act accordingly" :amen:
There are just some where deterrents mean nothing.
The European Union has voted, overwhelmingly, to accept the Ukrainian application for admittance to the E.U.
Nice!
Worthy cause. Neutral, non-partisan, with the sole objective of helping and saving lives.Donated to the ICRC dot ORG today, I decided it was worthwhile.
(International Committee of the Red Cross)
Albeit this clip is 5 days old, a great perspective on Ukraine and on the recent trend of public shaming others for holding (gasp!) different views than the official narrative permits it. Glenn Greenwald goes in for a deep dive. Long - but first 30 minutes are plenty worth it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46bzpo2fPTw
I listened to Greenwald’s presentation and on the service he made some valid points. However, I found he sadly neglected to mention the Russia/Ukraine involvement in the Budapest Memorandum and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1994. The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons. At the time, Ukraine held the world’s third largest supply of nuclear weapons, which it agreed to return to Russia in order to get Russia’s agreement to not threaten Ukraine with them in the future. In my opinion, Russia is now in violation of both agreements and to now claim that Ukraine’s desire to join NATO is a threat to Russia is pure BS.
You have a right to express an opposing opinion, but in doing so, you should not avoid presenting significant facts to the contrary.
I listened to Greenwald’s presentation and on the service he made some valid points. However, I found he sadly neglected to mention the Russia/Ukraine involvement in the Budapest Memorandum and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1994. The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons. At the time, Ukraine held the world’s third largest supply of nuclear weapons, which it agreed to return to Russia in order to get Russia’s agreement to not threaten Ukraine with them in the future. In my opinion, Russia is now in violation of both agreements and to now claim that Ukraine’s desire to join NATO is a threat to Russia is pure BS.
You have a right to express an opposing opinion, but in doing so, you should not avoid presenting significant facts to the contrary.
Does anyone think that at any time US forces would ever defend Ukraine because of that agreement? Sadly that agreement meant nothing.
Now if Putin is in violation of that agreement than we are as well as we are not defending their country in any meaningful way so I guess we're both bad guys.
Tired of advice that sounds smart and goes nowhere?
The useful part of this niche is small. That's what this list is for.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime. We only send when it's worth it.

