Hospitals are doing what they need to do to survive. Their first interest, sadly, is to financially survive. Many cases of death are labeled as covid because it pays better and hospitals must survive.
Hospitals are doing what they need to do to survive. Their first interest, sadly, is to financially survive. Many cases of death are labeled as covid because it pays better and hospitals must survive.
Hospitals make their living on surgery and aftercare. They don't make much money when operating rooms are not in use. Just like an airplane makes no money siting on the ground with no passengers.
Do you know how many staff members were furloughed during the big covid outbreak? Thousands because their skills did not work well with covid.
A record number of nurses and healthcare workers have lost their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic as hospitals halted revenue-generating elective surgeries and routine procedures, according to Newsweek. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, healthcare lost 1.4 million jobs in April.Ju
They didn't voluntarily do anything. They were forced by their state governments to not do them. They had no choice.
You're right, surgery does generate the most revenue for hospitals. Don't you think it's odd then that so many hospitals (106) would voluntarily suspend elective surgeries? Their biggest money maker.
https://www.beckershospitalreview.c...tive-procedures-amid-covid-19-resurgence.html
Ah, got it, the theory that you're peddling is that any hospital admission during the time of COVID = a Covid patient. Don't worry, that's not true but I know you won't take my word for it so we can end the discussion.Not odd at all; they are doing what is morally right yet at the same time if you get rushed there for a broken leg you WILL have covid as well.
As suspected... You actually have no science to substantiate your assertions. No data, just feelings.I will concede to your strong agruments. Well stated. Personal responsibility is i guess an outdated idea we should all just focus on conspiracies and finger pointing. That is surely the best way out of this mess. Who needs science and data and character anyway right guys.
That's absolutely true. Hospitals are testing everyone for Covid, symptomatic or not. And despite the known fact that PCR is a meaningless and error prone way to test, if the patient is positive, they're listed as a Covid patient. Symptomatic or not. And, yes, hospitals do get more money for Covid cases.Ah, got it, the theory that you're peddling is that any hospital admission during the time of COVID = a Covid patient. Don't worry, that's not true but I know you won't take my word for it so we can end the discussion.
Well that's the scoop I get from very old and good friend of mine who is a senior administrator at a very big hospital in these parts. It's okay it was fun.
Uh, yes, hospitals are testing everyone for Covid. Those who have a positive test are put in quarantine and given special quarantine medical procedures. Those who don't test positive go into Gen Med or wherever they are bound for the hospital. Not 100% of hospital admissions test positive for Covid.That's absolutely true. Hospitals are testing everyone for Covid, symptomatic or not. And despite the known fact that PCR is a meaningless and error prone way to test, if the patient is positive, they're listed as a Covid patient. Symptomatic or not. And, yes, hospitals do get more money for Covid cases.
My rationale has nothing to do with politics - I don't play for either team - and everything to do with understanding the risks relative to the reward. So if there's a vaccine for the common cold, I would wait a very long time before considering it. I get vaccinated for the flu because it's stood the test of time - the risk is very low and the payoff is that I don't have down time where I feel like sh*t for a week or two. But Covid vaccines haven't been tested over a long period of time so we don't know all the risks yet. Perhaps being exposed to Covid has long-term consequences. We don't know that yet, either. But my chances of being infected by it are pretty slim and, since it's not gonna kill me, I'll take those chances rather than the vaccine.Also, remove politics from the situation. Why would you not get the vaccine?
Long term safety? I get it, cool, don't get the vaccine then. No big deal.
Another hypothetical, would you only get a vaccine for a deadly disease? If a vaccine were developed for the common cold, would you get it? I sure would.
My rationale has nothing to do with politics - I don't play for either team - and everything to do with understanding the risks relative to the reward. So if there's a vaccine for the common cold, I would wait a very long time before considering it. I get vaccinated for the flu because it's stood the test of time - the risk is very low and the payoff is that I don't have down time where I feel like sh*t for a week or two. But Covid vaccines haven't been tested over a long period of time so we don't know all the risks yet. Perhaps being exposed to Covid has long-term consequences. We don't know that yet, either. But my chances of being infected by it are pretty slim and, since it's not gonna kill me, I'll take those chances rather than the vaccine.

