Anyway, the existence of ridiculously large dildos is not a major factor in men's body image and anxieties about penis size, I think. You'd have to know basically nothing about women to think that just because such things exist, they represent the ideal penis size from a female POV and that any man who doesn't measure up is inadequate.
Problem is, a lot of men on this site have this problem. They have an issue with their size and view it a sexually beneficial at all times. Even the forums have lent themselves to this form of thinking, since all the members continue to perpetrate this thought process. The success forum is riddled with the sexual significance of a larger penis. A good few members do PE simply for health purposes (staying hard longer, being harder), or just to grow for their own personal satisfaction. Some members are legitimately smaller than average, and want to hit/surpass that average. I think its incredibly important to sit down and really honestly consider why you are doing PE, and what you plan to get out of it.
Another thing is, I DO NOT buy into the whole evolutionary cocksize preference theory. Sure, I do believe cocksize has developed evolutionarily, but as a preference? No. Look at breasts for hells sake! If it was an evolutionary addiction, all men would always want big breasts. The bigger the breasts, the better. Breasts are an immediate and obvious sign of fertility, and clearly that means we should all demand huge boobies!
Or...
Maybe it isn't that clear. Sure, most guys like larger-than-average breasts, but there IS an upper limit of size that most guys appreciate. Also, a man can still easily appreciate smaller breasts... or more shapely breasts. Sure, most guys are in agreement, they aren't fans of flat chests, but there is something about a girl with tinier tits that is also appealing... also this sense of beauty is not apparent throughout history. Signs of fertility have changed. Once upon a time, heavier weight was preferable since large fat stores meant longer survival. It has been argued that today, from a socio-cultural point of view, the skinny look has developed due to a consumer society... and it got pushed until it became a health issue. Because of that, as well as a failing economy, a bit of "cushon for the pushin" isn't so bad... and we have found what we consider from a scientific point of view as an ideal healthy weight (which can vary from individual to individual). Science has taken over to decide what we find attractive... so if I can impregnate a woman test-tube style, my penis suddenly serves less of a purpose evolutionarily. If the argument is physiological only, and we are saying that a penis can hit certain spots better than others when it is bigger, I would argue that penis size is negligible due to the far greater importance of other factos such as angles... hell, even angles is unimportant when compared to a woman's individual physiological situation! A woman may have a sensitive vagina, a wider one, a deeper one, weaker/stronger pelvic muscles, etc. as I mentioned in my last post here! Even more important, is the psychology of it all! The mind can completely shut down or instigate arousal!
To all those who believe that size is important for your sexual existence, please learn your penis has no control. You do. If you want a bigger penis, at least figure out why, and stop blaming it on women.
