FOCUS YOUR PE & GAIN! TGC Theory Explained!

[JonPop]

Hey babbis, please start your own thread in the "Progress Log" Much easier to follow for all of us. Thanks, JP

 

[remek]

Someone just asked me:

Damn! Are there spark notes for this?!!

I'll try to make it as simple as possible here:

STEP 1: Find out whether your tunica is the limit or the smooth muscle is the limit. Here's how:

1) Measure your BPFSL and your BPEL. Find out how much greater your BPFSL is than your BPEL. If it's around .5" or more, it indicates that the smooth muscle is your limit. If it's around .25" or less, it indicates that your tunica is probably your limit.

2) What's your erection quality like? If you consistently have rock-solid erections and very hard erections, then the tunica is most likely your limit. If your erections are anything but, you'll want to work out your smooth muscle.

STEP 2: Focus on your limit.

1) If your smooth muscle is your limit: Adjust your routine so it is mostly girth-based (i.e. clamping, supra slammers, Ulis, and other girth exercises).

2) If your tunica is your limit: Adjust your routine so it is mostly length-based (i.e. with length exercises, hanging, extenders, jelqs with a low erection level, etc.)

Hope this helps!

 

[JonPop]

Please post this to BetterMan. Thanks.
Not too much discussion of your theory at BMan, some people are slow to throw out what's comfortable.

 

[kingpole]

i had 2/10Ths of an inch to get to 8"NBP. something i have been trying to do for months now. Yesturday morning i hit 8"nbp for the first time. I think it may be due to applying this theory. I started implimenting it last Saturday. I did 3 length sessions with only length PE. And i did two ballooning sessions with 8 fingered uli's otherwise known as Supra Slammers. I will continue with this pattern to see if more gains come.

 

[remek]

Please post this to BetterMan. Thanks.
Not too much discussion of your theory at BMan, some people are slow to throw out what's comfortable.

Done

 

[beavertaffy]

I have a question. When you say that the penis is X-% smooth muscle, how is that measured? Is that by mass when flaccid, by volume when flaccid, by mass or volume when erect? Is that compared to the mass or volume of the ligaments, nerves, blood vessels, lymph vessels and cartilage, or just compared to some of these things? Are the cadavers penises completely drained of blood before the measurements are taken?

I'm just curious. Obviously the take home point is that younger penises and healthier penises have more smooth muscle, but I tend to want to understand exactly how statistics come about.

 

[Iguana]

From my understanding, it is a percentage of tissue mass. It wouldn't make any difference whether it was flaccid or erect.
It's compared to collage composition. I think other components such as nerves, blood vessels would be minute in compairson.

 

[bambam11]

This is perfect post.Congragulation.
What are you guys thinking about this?
i am 6.7 erect lenth 4.7 girth and my BDFSL is 6.00 my EQ i think that is around 9 i have 18 years.
i don't now what to exercise MY SMOOTH MUSLE or my TUNICA?with my routine i have more strong erection,small girth gains,
flaccid gains but i don't have erect lenth gains.I DON't have off days guys.Did you think that i must to have off days?i have just for kegels.pls answer.much love

 

[kwmass]

Great post,

You guys are really researching this stuff. It was a very informative read, and it holds for my case. I have to focus on my tunica according to this theory, which was already what I was thinking myself. But your theory puts the scientific background into my intuition.

 

[PaperMate]

OK so I have a question...My BPFSL is about .5" greater than my BPEL and my erection quality is a 9.5. I am a newbie to manual PE (I used a traction device for about 7 months prior to finding this site) My current routine is pretty well balanced focusing on both SM and Tunica. Based on this theory, or at least my understanding of it, I am clueless as to what it tells someone in my position as it appears neither the tunica or SM are my limiting factor. What measures should I take to ensure my workouts will produce gains? Is anyone else in this same position and been able to make gains?

 

[Iguana]

Sounds like you are pretty much in the middle of the road. As far as what to focus on, I would target ligs and tunica. Your positive EQ along with a small BPFSL/BPEL ratio indicates you could benefit from focusing on your connective tissues.

Good luck and let us know how this works out for you.

-Iguana

 

[seeking8.5x6]

Any new results from this thread, I started the read over at MOS and signed up for your forums as you are the originator of the theory and i am curious as to any new data that has been collected.

Currently I am sitting at about .75 BPFSL over my BPEL. EQ is maybe a 6.5 at the moment. routine has mainly been hanging and little to no girth work the past few months. Just started girth work again yesterday and my revising my routine to go more jelq and power jelq with a clamp session every other day.

 

[CHEE]

Iguana and Remek, as I read your post about the theory of the tunica or smooth muscle being the limiting factor and affecting the gains. I came to believe that your theory might be true and show good results (gains) if applied correctly. Also by reading your theory I came to figure out my limiting factor and when to use the proper exercise to decrease the limiting factor and increase the gains.
I also think that this theory will help men achieve faster results if; they apply the theory correctly, pay attention to the change in signs of limiting factor.
I think you guy’s are on the right track.

EQ 9.5
BPFL=BPEL
Limiting factor Tunica

 

[omgitscj]

I'm tinking dere be sumtin to dis one!

I'm tinking dere be sumtin to dis one!

Well I thik this is much more than a theory I think it is fact. Everything adds up. I am DEFINITELY going to test this I will have my stats hopefully tomorrow. Can't wait to factor this to my routine starting on the 29th!

 

[omgitscj]

But then again I may be a bad trial person I am an 18 boy so I have a raging boner about 27 hours/day.

 

[omgitscj]

I thought up of a question:

Actually more of a scenario:

Lets say Jim has his length right where he wants it to where it's big, but not too big. But he wants to get his girth up and has lets say a 9.5 EQ and his BPEL and BPFL are lets say .15 apart. Obviously the tunica is his limiting factor. How would he go about getting JUST girth gains WITHOUT length gains?

This isn't me but soon it will be because I have heard it is easiest to do length and then girth and I don't want to bottom out in a girl I am a balls-deep kind of guy. Is there any way to do JUST girth that would increase girth and not just your EQ or should I undershoot my length goal and then hit my girth goal while gaining the rest of length?

 

[matttkd]

Hi
My BPSFL is quite a bit bigger than my BPEL, which going by this theory means that it is my smooth muscle that is the limiting factor, correct?
I tend to find that I can gain girth fairly easily (even if only for a week or so if pe not kept up). I assume that this is because the smooth muscle is the limiting factor and can easily expand further to fill the tunica.
So the theory certainly seems to fit. My problem however is that I have always been relatively girthy, and I seem to be able to gain girth easily, which is great, however I want to focus more on length, at least for now until it seems a little more in proportion to the girth.
Am I right in thinking that by continuing the girth exercises the smooth muscle will eventually fill out a little more, expanding my BPEL?
Also which exercises would one recommend to really attack the length as the beginners routine I've been on seems not to help the length as much as I would like.

 

[openyourheart]

Thanks for sharing, but i still believe the most healthiest way to enlarge penis size or strengthen the potence or improve the kidney function is iron penis qigong at QIGONGPENIS.COM, though i haven't practised it yet. I heard there are also some courses like jelq, but i think it's fundamentally different. After all, if you're a qigong lover or tai-chi practiser, you will know it better.

 

[Muay Thai]

Has anyone had good gains going off this theory?

 

[bodeen]

Great post, very helpful. Thanks guys.