Would you say a 8x6" dick is big or huge?
- Thread starter joeshmo209
- Start date
Not really, by "real" I mean it actually has to be 7 or 8 inches, not internet measurements which usually are far above reality
but yeah, also NBP would make sense, but unless you're fat as fatass it shouldnt really make all that difference imo
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2012
- Messages
- 865
- Reaction score
- 33
- Points
- 48
I don't know my BF but I'm 6' and currently a little under 175lbs so definitely not a fatass, but my fat pad is still a good 3/4".
Anyway Datass, sorry for my unsubstantiated guess, but I think OP implied that the 8x6 would have to be real or the thread really wouldn't make any sense.
BTW, how do you know that in Italy 7" is seen as huge? Do you happen to have one of those real 7 inchers, and have been called huge by every person who saw it? Or do you mean that Italians have a smaller average size? What are your sources?
Anyway Datass, sorry for my unsubstantiated guess, but I think OP implied that the 8x6 would have to be real or the thread really wouldn't make any sense.
BTW, how do you know that in Italy 7" is seen as huge? Do you happen to have one of those real 7 inchers, and have been called huge by every person who saw it? Or do you mean that Italians have a smaller average size? What are your sources?
I'm sorry I'm not bringing concrete evidence/sources, but at least here 18 cm (7.1 inches) is the number that separate huge from big/average, there are a lot of 18+ jokes around here referring to penis size rather than the age of an individual (I know it sounds weird as hell ahah).
I'm using pretty much common sense, I guess here in Italy people just have lower standards, for example this is also the case for the male body, while in america/australia or other countries, a fitness/bodybuilder build (although he still has to look like a human, not a roided meat head) is generally seen as something "hot", here in italy even if you're just a bit "hench", girls genuinely dont like you, so they prefere a skinnier/skinnyfat body so to speak, I know that's pretty much off-topic but this is how I actually percieved it to be, based on living in italy and comparing our standards to general "internet" standards from all the other countries, so I tried to explain it the best I could.
Last edited:
Thanks man, I find the different perspectives of other countries fascinating and I believe you are giving an accurate view. In America, bigger is better with a lot of things, however I do see a trend where the skinny, but fit, male body is more in "fashion" these days. Big body builders are still prominent, but it is not like it was in the 80's and 90's where it was cooler. I am fit, and may even be considered "hench" in Italy, but I would never be mistaken for a body builder.
vulcan
Retired Moderator, PE Gym Editor, PEGym Hero
Lol! You think the subject of what is big is going to be settled in this thread? Have you taken a swing around the forum? This subject, although pounded into a bloody unrecognizable pulp, is alive and kickin' and here to stay.
vulcan
Retired Moderator, PE Gym Editor, PEGym Hero
Definitely huge in and out of real world guys.. Porn has alot to do with angles. We gotta remember that fellas.
Regardless of country or ethnicity, if a locale holds fashion in high regard, skinnier body builds are far more attractive than "meatheads."
I believe the funniest demonym I've come across, ha-ha, is "flower boy."
I believe the funniest demonym I've come across, ha-ha, is "flower boy."
Padawan787
Moderator Reserve, PEGym Hero
I went from big to huge. 8x6 is quite rare and something most men will have to work towards and some will never be able to have.
It may not look huge depending on someone's height and frame but 7.5+ will not miss hitting the cervix if not careful so that is getting huge in length and anything 5.75+ girth wise is still huge and a tight fit on most woman. So if you are packing a 7.5+x5.75+(heck even 5.5+) then you have a huge penis (maybe not massive but really in front of her face and even in her it's huge).
I have 5.7 in girth and although i have been told many times my dick is very 'fat', 'thick' etc. to me it seemed 'average' until i recently discovered the truth about average thickness. This to me proves that there are two ways of looking at this issue. One is size compared to averages (medical stats...not hearsay) and the other is your own perception based on your experiences.
As I said in my earlier posts I always saw my dick as short and when i first hit puberty even 'below average' in length. Part of that was exposure to porn but mostly it was appearance since most of the other penis' i saw were much thinner (i didn't go around with a tape so its hard to judge girth) so they seemed much longer (and of course you look down at your own dick but at other ones). When i started having sex women told me it was 'big' and some even called it 'huge'. Length wise they said it was above average and was the longest or second longest most of them had ever had.
This changed my perception of my dick size and when I investigated the medical stats i realised my dick was not massive but it was above average in length and well above average in girth. It seems silly now but up until the last few years I never realised i was trying to wear condoms that were far too tight because of my girth and it always seems strange to me that no matter how wet my dick was always hard to get into most of the girls i was with. I thought that must be how it was for most guys (turns out my mates tell me otherwise since most of them seem to be thinner than me....not that we discuss measurements). I still can't hit the deep spots on my girl so in that sense my length is still not all that 'big' if you ask me.
As to whether the terms 'big' or 'huge' really matter that is totally different. I suspect they mean nothing to most women and are just ego stroking for most men. Our obsession with size terms is not based on sexual performance in most cases but rather on competitive spirit and ego issues....
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2012
- Messages
- 865
- Reaction score
- 33
- Points
- 48
I think 8x6 is huge if you were naturally that size.
It's big if you had to PE to get there.
I think a true natural 8x6 probably has a larger cc than an 8x6 from PE. I feel my cc is much thinner if I discount all the puffy skin and veins. I remember having much less skin before I started PE.
It's big if you had to PE to get there.
I think a true natural 8x6 probably has a larger cc than an 8x6 from PE. I feel my cc is much thinner if I discount all the puffy skin and veins. I remember having much less skin before I started PE.
I think an 8x6 dick is the cut off point between big and huge. Anything above that is really big or huge. If you surveyed a bunch of guys about their idwal size,, I bet 8x6 would be the winner.
