Girth wise it's far from big. You know how it goes though. I think the proper classification would be I have a longer than average dick. haha
From Your experience
- Thread starter helpmeout
- Start date
Girth wise it's far from big. You know how it goes though. I think the proper classification would be I have a longer than average dick. haha
Steve23
Retired ModeratorPEGym Hero
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2011
- Messages
- 8,098
- Reaction score
- 260
- Points
- 0
Quit worrying about other guys dicks, and what dicks girls have had before, men care more about it then women do , women remember the size and that's it, they don't care about past experiences and average is just fine. Stop being yourself up about unimportant things, your dick is part of you, you're not part of your dick.
This^^^ Didn't you guys read that thread with that girl posting about his girlfriend and then she saw it and replied? Her response is EXACTLY how almost all women feel about dick size.
Thats what I mean though. You are in the same boat as me with that statement. Every study says 6 inches is the average BPEL if not LESS. You are 7.75. Almost a full 2 inches above average. That (if you believed the studies) would be way above average, above big, most likely venturing into huge territory. Yet just like me, deep down inside, you cannot except the fact that 6 inch bpel is the average.
His reply acknowledges that he's big length wise, he said his 4.75" girth isn't big
CaptainJohnson
Retired Moderator, Senior Member, PEGym Hero
Also, a lot of the people here have made gains. Also, I don't know why, but it seems to me men with larger cocks are more concerned with cock size. Weird, huh?
And yes, tonnes of smaller guys don't post. Even this thread is being viewed by 21 guests as we speak. That is twice the number of members viewing it. I have seen threads here with 2 members viewing it, also being checked out by something around 40+ guests. This tells you something. There are also a lot of members that do not post, but still log on. Again, there are a few members who DO post, but don't list their starting size.
If you consider that 1 in 40 guys have a 7 inch dick, and only look at member starting size, then things start to make a bit more sense.
Ahh, sorry. I misread his post. Either way, 4.75 girth is average, if not above average depending on what studies you look at. Average girth plus mega length equals a huge dick in my eyes
.Ahh, sorry. I misread his post. Either way, 4.75 girth is average, if not above average depending on what studies you look at. Average girth plus mega length equals a huge dick in my eyes
most studies have 4.75" girth on the lower end of average. But I agree he's still large overall, I wouldn't say huge but definitely large. It's tough to compare what defines large when one stat is way high but the other one isn't.
Do you guys think the avg of that thundersplace poll with 4000 respondents would be biased downwards because it is a PE forum?
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 313
- Points
- 0
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 313
- Points
- 0
You would think so, but I think men of all lengths and girths are drawn to these
sites. It's not just those men who are below average. We all have our insecurities
no matter what the size of our cock is. And for some of us, it's the challenge
of improving ourselves along with our collective dicks--thus the arrival of men
who are well endowed.
My p.e. pal back at Thunder's once told me: "No matter how large you get,
there will always be someone out there who is larger." Truer words were
never spoken. He was one wise man.
sites. It's not just those men who are below average. We all have our insecurities
no matter what the size of our cock is. And for some of us, it's the challenge
of improving ourselves along with our collective dicks--thus the arrival of men
who are well endowed.
My p.e. pal back at Thunder's once told me: "No matter how large you get,
there will always be someone out there who is larger." Truer words were
never spoken. He was one wise man.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 313
- Points
- 0
No, I STRONGLY believe that it's the opposite. It's basically a proven fact that more men with average or big penises more frequently are insecure with them and want them to be larger. I've read an article written by a doctor that said that doctors get many more men who are big asking if they can make their dicks bigger than guys who are small.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 313
- Points
- 0
It must go back to some primitive urge of survival of the fittest--the guy
with the biggest dick is more likely to impregnate, etc. Although, you can
get a woman pregnant without penetration. Those sperm can wiggle their way
down her vaginal canal and hit jackpot.
with the biggest dick is more likely to impregnate, etc. Although, you can
get a woman pregnant without penetration. Those sperm can wiggle their way
down her vaginal canal and hit jackpot.
I agree. I think it has to do with the competitive nature of man. And I don't think we ever lose that even in situations that don't matter. What I mean is, a few years ago when I was younger, my dick was only 5ish inches NBPEL.
I thought to myself, "God, I would give anything to just have a 6 inch dick."
Now I do, and It is still just as dissatisfying as the 5 incher. I always want to be bigger and better. I cringe at the idea of my old girlfriend holding a dick that is bigger than mine. I'm sure if I was in the top 10 percent, I'd want to be in the top 5, if I was in the top 5, i'd want to be in the top 2. It's just the nature of man to strive to be better than anyone else. I believe thats what got us this far as a species. However, some of us seem to lack the ability to turn it off for trivial things such as this.
One may argue it is fear of getting made fun of, and partially that may be true, but unless you have a really small dick, or a real bitch of a girlfriend, no girl is ever going to laugh at your dick.
We just associate it with being more of a man, and instinctually, like you said, being more of a man is sortof a "survival of the fittest" type deal.
I thought to myself, "God, I would give anything to just have a 6 inch dick."
Now I do, and It is still just as dissatisfying as the 5 incher. I always want to be bigger and better. I cringe at the idea of my old girlfriend holding a dick that is bigger than mine. I'm sure if I was in the top 10 percent, I'd want to be in the top 5, if I was in the top 5, i'd want to be in the top 2. It's just the nature of man to strive to be better than anyone else. I believe thats what got us this far as a species. However, some of us seem to lack the ability to turn it off for trivial things such as this.
One may argue it is fear of getting made fun of, and partially that may be true, but unless you have a really small dick, or a real bitch of a girlfriend, no girl is ever going to laugh at your dick.
We just associate it with being more of a man, and instinctually, like you said, being more of a man is sortof a "survival of the fittest" type deal.
I don't normally look at pics of people's dicks but I made an exception for you
BTBrian, when you said it doesn't look smaller, does that mean you saw it as looking 6 inches nbpel from the underside view? If this is the case, then I am actually truly delusional.
Get rid of the word better in that post. You thing bigger automatically equals better which is far from the truth.
I don't know how big your dick looks dude. It doesn't looks small by any means.
Average and median are not the same, and I think that this distinction throws off our perception of the data. Remember that median is the exact point where half are larger and half are smaller. So if you look at the median figure, and not the average, there will be a more even distribution of guys that are above and below. Of course, we physically can't account for the fact that cock-sure men were more likely to participate, so we just have to work with the data at hand and remember: It's probably not a precise representation of the population.
I think 11x7 noted this earlier in the thread somewhere, but in case you missed it there it is.
Yes, but I also do believe it somewhat evens out. The less cocksure men may be less inclined to participate in a size study and the more cock-sure ones more inclined. I feel like it would also be this way with women, thus shifting the average of what they experience up a few notches. I think this also depends on the woman.
If your fucking average women who fuck average looking men, then no. But I strongly believe for those kindof "club girls" and the real attractive ones, the only guys who have confidence to go after them and do things with them would be the very well hung men, shifting those women's average up a bit.
If your fucking average women who fuck average looking men, then no. But I strongly believe for those kindof "club girls" and the real attractive ones, the only guys who have confidence to go after them and do things with them would be the very well hung men, shifting those women's average up a bit.
