UOTE=Padawan787;691754]Bump.[/QUOTE]
've seen it mentioned that JP has worn it for 2h, what is the safe upper limit in terms of time?
Do you have an idea of the hanger's upper weight limit?
How is this different to the vacutech hanger (which also uses a vacuum to attach to the glans)?
Any idea on initial pricing? Will there be worldwide shipping? Any details on your warrantee and parts repair/replacement policy?
Do you plan on publishing your entire study? Not necessarily submitting it for peer review, just making it available online.
I will respond to each question in order:
JP- I suggest you ask JP directly, wearing time after completing conditioning (similar to Bib Hanger) is literally open ended.
1. Weight Limits. Continuous wearing time alters the equation as previously mentioned, so it is not just maximum weight but the implications of continuous wearing without a stop start scenario because of circulatory constraints. So in my view 10- 15 lbs continuous wearing, let’s say for 1 hour to 1.5 hours is as productive as 4 x 20 minute sessions at 20-25 lbs. This is how I answered the question to "donjelqer 76 ". This is my scientific intuition on weight x uninterrupted time traction- this principle is , in fact, considered valid in spinal traction therapy. There is a scientific expression that long continuous duration requires less amounts of weight be used to accomplish the goal. I still feel one needs to exceed 10 lbs to induce collagen deformation, but now we have continuous open ended time. I have worn the LG Hanger with 15 lbs (not the upper limit) for an hour resulting in a productive enormous stretch. My thinking is that you do not need to go above this level to get an equivalent stretch using 20- 25 lbs for four sets of 20 minutes.
Your question is a good one but this is the only way I can answer it to give a gauge of capacity which in this case is based on not only absolute weight but the open ended uninterrupted time factor."
2. Vacuteck Comparison: Please PM me with your address and erect circumference behind the glans, and if you are circumcised or uncircumcised we will send you the LG Hanger with silicone sleeve, and you can tell me your observations and comparisons, so you will have direct experience and will not have to take my word for it.
3. Initial Pricing for complete set consisting of the LG hanger. The LG hanger dome, the silicone sleeve, vacuum pump with gauge, appropriate protection tape, instructions, and beginners weight of 3 pounds sells for $295, however the parts can be ordered separately at a prorated cost substantively less.
4. Warrantee for parts repair- the LG hanger is built as you will see like a Sherman Tank, in the remote possibility that part replacement is required, such will be assured, which I will discuss with the manufacturer to determine a fair warranty time frame.
5. Disclosure, transperancy is essential, the co-inventor can address the details of the Medical use better than I because as he was a participant, I can as I have previously reiterated, the LG Hanger was used in a medical setting by post operative penis enlargement patients for its traction capability, a necessity in these post surgical cases to prevent scar adhesions and to promote lengthening. One of the surgery patients was also the manufacturer of the LG Hanger and my coworker, he gained 2". Please understand this was a medical setting under MD surgeon. for more information my colleague can respond.
6. Peer review journals. At this stage of the PE evolution cycle, for get it. Use of this device in a medical setting is the best authentication or validation currently available. To generate a peer review journal here is what is necessary: A university setting; a professor interested in this field; students and lab techs; application for funding from eg. NIH National Institutes of Health for hundreds of thousands of dollars; if you are so fortunate to receive the funding than you proceed with a statistically significant sample of 30 reliable men who will depeneably participate in this study for several years; careful controls must be implemented to insure reliability and precision of results; once this extremely laborious process is complete than you can write for a peer review journal. I have done this twice in my life, once study photoaffinity inhibition of aldose reductase (diabetic cataracts) in the eye funded by NIH (National Institutes of Health), and Vitamin C an ophthalmic wound healing funded by VA (Veterans Administration).
Peer review: When the scientific community becomes sufficiently aware of PE to perform controlled experiments at substantial costs in labor, time and money we will have peer review generated journals on this subject.