Yeah I don't care ether. I'm sure all will be tight for meI don't care if my girlfriend had bigger, as she doesn't care if I had tighter, pointless stuff.
Yeah I don't care ether. I'm sure all will be tight for meI don't care if my girlfriend had bigger, as she doesn't care if I had tighter, pointless stuff.
The thing I am aparently not making clear enough in my posts, is, I am talking about the not average girl. The girl that has had a lot of experience because these seem to be the ones that hurt guys the most. I believe the numbers show that the average girl has about 4 partners in their lifetime. I have been talking about women with 10+ partners which is about 250% the average. These are not normal girls, these are not average girls. Yet, I keep getting responses about average girls. Look if you are sleeping with women that have had 10+ partners, these are not average women. Therefore it is incorrect to assume that they would follow the average patern of partners, they don't, 10+ does not equal 4.
Women understate partner number rountinely ,10 plus is not at all out of the ordinary.
On a more humorous note, staline. The site you linked to regards it as a scientific and a valid study condom size and facts: The simple truth about erect penis circumference
Seriously though, that appears to be a good summary of various studies.
I would not even trust that surveyYes it is, but if you read carefully, you will see that the lifestyle unpublished study has not been incorporated into the scientific average... But rather in the global average... So I doubt the author really believed it is a serious study... Am I the only one to see that? Once again, where are the data of this study?
I repeat: I asked whether you could supply with any evidence of the bimodal girth curve. Still nothing (and no, lifestyle does not count as one)? And please, conserning the reputability of a condom company, I have no problem with their capacity of editing a serious study. Another example?
DUREX Scientific
On a site called "durex scientific", you end up with the highest average ever found on a study with incorporating around 6% of girths above 190mm (7.5in). What the hell? What about Durex? Is this company reputable?
Yes it is, but if you read carefully, you will see that the lifestyle unpublished study has not been incorporated into the scientific average... But rather in the global average... So I doubt the author really believed it is a serious study... Am I the only one to see that? Once again, where are the data of this study?
I repeat: I asked whether you could supply with any evidence of the bimodal girth curve. Still nothing (and no, lifestyle does not count as one)? And please, concerning the reputability of a condom company, I have no problem with their capacity of producing condoms, but rather I do have concerns about their capacity of editing a serious study. Another example?
DUREX Scientific
On a site called "durex scientific", you end up with the highest average ever found on a study with incorporating around 6% of girths above 190mm (7.5in). What the hell? What about Durex? Is this company reputable?
Nationality Metric Imperial Name Note Lifespan United States![]()
2.72 m 8 ft 11 in Robert Wadlow Tallest person in recorded history confirmed by Guinness World Records.[SUP][1][/SUP] 1918–1940 United States![]()
2.67 m 8 ft 9 in John Rogan Second tallest male in recorded history. Weighed only175 lb (79 kg). Unable to stand due to ankylosis c. 1868–1905 United States![]()
2.63 m 8 ft 7½ in John F. Carroll 2.44 m (8 ft 0 in) standing height, 2.64 m (8 ft 7¾ in) assuming normal spinal curvature 1932–1969 Finland![]()
2.51 m 8 ft 3 in Väinö Myllyrinne Recognized as the tallest living person from 1940 to his death in 1963. Said to have been 2.51 m in his thirties. 1909–1963 Canada![]()
2.51 m 8 ft 3 in Edouard Beaupré Tallest strongman as well as tallest wrestler in history. 1881-1904
I also like the overall point presented - its quite true that reaching any magic penis size can't solve all of your problems. There is definitely a difference between having a healthy desire to to be at the top, and obsessing to the point that it hurts other areas of your life.
Interesting Post Break, It is all relative in the end.
I think I get what you're saying Break. You might as well have made a new thread titled something like "a big dick won't solve all your problems" because you are getting pretty far off topic. I agree with what you're saying.
Thanks for calling me a freak
Also your analysis of female psychology leaves a lot to be wished for. If women were all so money-hungry and cock-hungry, the world would fall apart... quickly. Inches, IQ and Dollars do not measure a man and most women reserve love for a man with a more special measurement. What you said about lacking emotional connection in sex seems to be applied heavily to your beliefs, even though you list it as something that causes dissatisfaction.
Break, it depends on where you look, or where your perspectives are.
Again, it depends on your perspective.
When I was homeless, I was walking through the streets without a coat. Some guy stopped his truck and gave me the clothes off his back - literally. Didn't introduce himself, didn't stop to chat. Just saved my life and went off into the night.
There's good out there.
Yes, there IS bad out there.
But what you see most is where you choose to focus your attentions. Right now, it seems like you're focussing on the negatives out there.
+100
its always easier to notice something that you're already set on looking for.
There really is a good mix of "good" and "bad" people in the world, it is what it is. I know the bad is there, but rarely notice it because I choose not to.
Yes, good and bad are just ideals in ones own mind. I live in my own reality, and I'm happy for it (regardless as to whether I view anything specifically as good or bad). I've seen others that live in their own reality, and they're miserable. Everyone has the right to live in their own reality and interpret the world as they see fit - it doesn't affect my reality one bit. The problem comes when someone tries to push their own reality off as fact, or tries to push it off on other people.
I respect that you have your own view, fine by me. But trying to tell me that the way I view the world around me is wrong isn't going to get anywhere because I simply don't let others influence the way I think or feel.

