What percentile is 6+ in girth?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Padawan787

Moderator Reserve, PEGym Hero
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,768
Reaction score
250
Points
0
Location
Europe
The thing I am aparently not making clear enough in my posts, is, I am talking about the not average girl. The girl that has had a lot of experience because these seem to be the ones that hurt guys the most. I believe the numbers show that the average girl has about 4 partners in their lifetime. I have been talking about women with 10+ partners which is about 250% the average. These are not normal girls, these are not average girls. Yet, I keep getting responses about average girls. Look if you are sleeping with women that have had 10+ partners, these are not average women. Therefore it is incorrect to assume that they would follow the average patern of partners, they don't, 10+ does not equal 4.

No way is it 4, that's way too conservative.

Most sexually active girls that I know (who are all roughly 21 or younger) have had 2-3 partners after 2 years of college. There is no way that the lifetime average is 4.
 

Pegasus

Administrator, PE Gym Editor, PEGym Hero; ,
Staff member
Excellent !
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
44,292
Reaction score
1,171
Points
133
Women understate partner number rountinely ,10 plus is not at all out of the ordinary.
 

Jm123

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
334
Reaction score
31
Points
0
Women understate partner number rountinely ,10 plus is not at all out of the ordinary.

I completely agree with you guys. I believe the numbers are bullshit as well. However, those are the published numbers, even though if you read most studies the authors points out that the numbers are not statistically correct; as there is almost always a higher number for men, and a lower number for women. To be valid, the studies should have an equal number for each sex.
 

staline

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
33
Reaction score
2
Points
0
On a more humorous note, staline. The site you linked to regards it as a scientific and a valid study condom size and facts: The simple truth about erect penis circumference

Seriously though, that appears to be a good summary of various studies.

Yes it is, but if you read carefully, you will see that the lifestyle unpublished study has not been incorporated into the scientific average... But rather in the global average... So I doubt the author really believed it is a serious study... Am I the only one to see that? Once again, where are the data of this study?

I repeat: I asked whether you could supply with any evidence of the bimodal girth curve. Still nothing (and no, lifestyle does not count as one)? And please, concerning the reputability of a condom company, I have no problem with their capacity of producing condoms, but rather I do have concerns about their capacity of editing a serious study. Another example?
DUREX Scientific
On a site called "durex scientific", you end up with the highest average ever found on a study with incorporating around 6% of girths above 190mm (7.5in). What the hell? What about Durex? Is this company reputable?
 
Last edited:

Thick_Unit

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
17
Points
0
Location
SoCal
Yes it is, but if you read carefully, you will see that the lifestyle unpublished study has not been incorporated into the scientific average... But rather in the global average... So I doubt the author really believed it is a serious study... Am I the only one to see that? Once again, where are the data of this study?

I repeat: I asked whether you could supply with any evidence of the bimodal girth curve. Still nothing (and no, lifestyle does not count as one)? And please, conserning the reputability of a condom company, I have no problem with their capacity of editing a serious study. Another example?
DUREX Scientific
On a site called "durex scientific", you end up with the highest average ever found on a study with incorporating around 6% of girths above 190mm (7.5in). What the hell? What about Durex? Is this company reputable?
I would not even trust that survey
 

Jm123

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
334
Reaction score
31
Points
0
Yes it is, but if you read carefully, you will see that the lifestyle unpublished study has not been incorporated into the scientific average... But rather in the global average... So I doubt the author really believed it is a serious study... Am I the only one to see that? Once again, where are the data of this study?

I repeat: I asked whether you could supply with any evidence of the bimodal girth curve. Still nothing (and no, lifestyle does not count as one)? And please, concerning the reputability of a condom company, I have no problem with their capacity of producing condoms, but rather I do have concerns about their capacity of editing a serious study. Another example?
DUREX Scientific
On a site called "durex scientific", you end up with the highest average ever found on a study with incorporating around 6% of girths above 190mm (7.5in). What the hell? What about Durex? Is this company reputable?

I repeat, I gave you an example and you said it does not count, cool. However it is an example that is widely cited, but you do not feel the evidence I gave is compelling to back up my opinion. Again that is cool, but I did in fact do as you asked. Now it is your turn to back up your statements that I highlighted, with scientific facts at the level that you expect of me. After that I might consider researching this further, and find additional studies that have found a bimodal distribution. However, I have already vastly exceeded the level of evidence for your claims, and consider this more backpedaling.

Again, I did in fact meet your earlier request, this is not a scientific journal, and as such I have already exceeded the standard of a forum. Yet you feel that I need to meet an arbitrary standard to have an opinion. So how about you shut me up, and provide me with studies backing up your claims, at the level you seek from me. Otherwise, all I am still seeing, is someone that called me out, made even bigger claims, and can't back it up. By the way I truly am looking forward to the scientific studies, especially the one showing size queens are <5% of the population. I honestly was not aware, that they were that rare. I figure you must have those studies at your fingetips, so I am all ears.

As to the durex site, that is obviously a survey, hence respondents. Lifestyles study, was performed with a Doctor observing and nurses measuring. So what exactly is your point? Lifestyles has alterior motives to make people think their dicks are small?
 
Last edited:

Break

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
217
Reaction score
41
Points
0
Obviously the truth is:
No one you know got a 6 inch girth

its rare as sh*t and its thick as fuck.... the biggest people out there ( Lex steele, mandingo, rocco siffredi....) people whos penises make girls pupils dilate 15x and their pussy gets wet right on seeing them are in the 6-6.5 bracket max....

so obviously it is a real outlier.


its like saying 7 feet isnt tall because of:
NationalityMetricImperialNameNoteLifespan
22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png
United States
2.72 m8 ft 11 inRobert WadlowTallest person in recorded history confirmed by Guinness World Records.[SUP][1][/SUP]1918–1940
22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png
United States
2.67 m8 ft 9 inJohn RoganSecond tallest male in recorded history. Weighed only175 lb (79 kg). Unable to stand due to ankylosisc. 1868–1905
22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png
United States
2.63 m8 ft 7½ inJohn F. Carroll2.44 m (8 ft 0 in) standing height, 2.64 m (8 ft 7¾ in) assuming normal spinal curvature1932–1969
22px-Flag_of_Finland.svg.png
Finland
2.51 m8 ft 3 inVäinö MyllyrinneRecognized as the tallest living person from 1940 to his death in 1963. Said to have been 2.51 m in his thirties.1909–1963
22px-Flag_of_Canada-1868-Red.svg.png
Canada
2.51 m8 ft 3 inEdouard BeaupréTallest strongman as well as tallest wrestler in history.1881-1904

so 6+ is huge. 6.25 is crazy. 6.5 + and your a freak.
and if it comes with a 8+ length, strong healthy body, sexual ability, lasting time, and super hardness.... your woman will never be able to leave you. and if she does shell still call you when shes feeling horny and unsatisfied by the 6x5's.


point being there will always be bigger out there, but if you perfect the WHOLE your golden because sex is synergy and a lot of elements come into play....

a 6.5 girth that cant stay fully hard, premature ejaculates, and is on an obese illeterate person will never reach the pussy of angelina jolie....

so if your goal is to increase size it should also be to become a sexual master. and as you become the latter youll be in the .000001 percentile of the extremely sexually skilled .

women dont bring calculators and stat tests to bed and orgasm upon every .01 girth increase
IDIOTS!

their brain works like this :

Oh hes hot,
ok lets fuck
OH sh*t thats huge
Oh sh*t hes hitting it right
Oh sh*t hes got good moves
oh sh*t i came like 10 times

as opposed to
well this is in shape and has a 130 iq etc but hes only in the 1%, but this guy has a 85 iq, kinda fat, and smells but has a .00001%

a girl will chose a millionaire over a avg salary man, but shes not going to chose the 157 million dollar man over the 157.8 milllion dollar man.... once your in the huge club your in there, what starts mattering is technique and how you use this great tool you have possesion of. thats what makes or breaks the deal once your in the club... penis size will only take you so far, after that you better start having the skills to compete against the hung guys that believe that all they need is their size.... just like rich people that think all they need is there money get the slutty fake bitches while the intelligent driven rich people get equally intelligent successful women rather than just gold diggers ( or size queens)


heres how a big penis can create dissatisfaction:
- guy over attaches significance to it ( cocky ) making it central in his belief of what causes sexual satisfaction
- poorly functioning organ
- unable to thrust, move, hit correct spots
- lacks emotional connection and keeping sex on a purely physical process plane as opposed to emotive plane, and bringing in artistic, creative, emotional aspects.

etc

but if used correctly it will outperform a small/ avg organ 100% of the time and create BPUCA a serious condition that has not been cured yet ( Big penis used correctly addiction)

but some of the time avg/ small perfect those areas which some larger men might forget about causing them to beat the larger man.


same sh*t different day.
-Finne
 
Last edited:

BigO

Administrator, PEGym Hero,"Woofer"
Staff member
Excellent !
Well Done !
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
30,378
Reaction score
3,416
Points
133
Location
An inch and 1/2 deeper than before
Interesting Post Break, It is all relative in the end.
 

GoingForGold

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
2,395
Reaction score
97
Points
0
Location
Streams, Mountains and Caves of the USA.
I think I get what you're saying Break. You might as well have made a new thread titled something like "a big dick won't solve all your problems" because you are getting pretty far off topic. I agree with what you're saying.

Thanks for calling me a freak:p

Also your analysis of female psychology leaves a lot to be wished for. If women were all so money-hungry and cock-hungry, the world would fall apart... quickly. Inches, IQ and Dollars do not measure a man and most women reserve love for a man with a more special measurement. What you said about lacking emotional connection in sex seems to be applied heavily to your beliefs, even though you list it as something that causes dissatisfaction.
 

donjelqer76

Retired Moderator, PEGym Hero
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction score
272
Points
0
Location
Ohio
I also like the overall point presented - its quite true that reaching any magic penis size can't solve all of your problems. There is definitely a difference between having a healthy desire to to be at the top, and obsessing to the point that it hurts other areas of your life.
 

BigO

Administrator, PEGym Hero,"Woofer"
Staff member
Excellent !
Well Done !
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
30,378
Reaction score
3,416
Points
133
Location
An inch and 1/2 deeper than before
I also like the overall point presented - its quite true that reaching any magic penis size can't solve all of your problems. There is definitely a difference between having a healthy desire to to be at the top, and obsessing to the point that it hurts other areas of your life.

So true DJ, so true indeed!
 

Break

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
217
Reaction score
41
Points
0
Interesting Post Break, It is all relative in the end.

Thank you.
I think I get what you're saying Break. You might as well have made a new thread titled something like "a big dick won't solve all your problems" because you are getting pretty far off topic. I agree with what you're saying.

Thanks for calling me a freak:p

Also your analysis of female psychology leaves a lot to be wished for. If women were all so money-hungry and cock-hungry, the world would fall apart... quickly. Inches, IQ and Dollars do not measure a man and most women reserve love for a man with a more special measurement. What you said about lacking emotional connection in sex seems to be applied heavily to your beliefs, even though you list it as something that causes dissatisfaction.

Unfortunately i am not calling you a freak for the simple fact that your measurement for mseg is pretty inaccurate/leaves a lot of doubt to public eye. shane diesel is in the 6.75 range so i think its quite simple to identify.
( also you lost credibility with me after shifting your bpel measurments around)

and to help shed some light: the world is driven by money hungry cock hungry women... and it is also driven by money hungry, pussy hungry men.... and yes it is falling apart.... look: HIV, AIDS, new forms of TB, Ghonneria that is drug resistant, Wars, Pollution, economic collapses, Debt crises's

its unsustainable.... only the minority are driven by higher, more divine principles.
and when it comes to women i know none driven by that.

regardless i want to hit 6.5 before everything collapses. that way they can write 9x6.5 on my tombstone....and underneath that my name,
 
Last edited:

Toadstool

Senior Member
Well Done !
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
7,024
Reaction score
417
Points
0
Break, it depends on where you look, or where your perspectives are.
 

Break

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
217
Reaction score
41
Points
0
Break, it depends on where you look, or where your perspectives are.

yea there are those that are at an intellectually elite level who are seperate of the masses/the commons ...

but in all honesty the commons and masses all behave the same way and always will
it all revolves around selfishness and what the person can gain for himself.
look at this act... that is viewed as something very respectable, good, kind, unselfish..


giving to charity.

it has already been polluted by the pride one gets in "looking" respectable, good, kind and selfless
so theres selfishness there

and then guilt...someone might feel guilty for being well off so they give to make THEMSELVES feel better.

we are shallow creatures that have mastered lying to ourselves. simple..
and look at religious people, they ignore science, fact, anything and they live OCD lives believing that a god/creator powerful enough to create earth would really give a fuck what you do on a sunday. or weather you call it a sunday. And that God really would program you to be attracted to women and make you want to fuck them but then punish you with etertnal hell to act on desires that he himself programmed...

people on earth are borderline insane, they believe in fictitious fairy tales and little patterns and organizations on dealing with things labeled bad aka sex, etc...
FUCKING LUNACY!
 

Toadstool

Senior Member
Well Done !
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
7,024
Reaction score
417
Points
0
Again, it depends on your perspective.

When I was homeless, I was walking through the streets without a coat. Some guy stopped his truck and gave me the clothes off his back - literally. Didn't introduce himself, didn't stop to chat. Just saved my life and went off into the night.
There's good out there.
Yes, there IS bad out there.

But what you see most is where you choose to focus your attentions. Right now, it seems like you're focussing on the negatives out there.
 

donjelqer76

Retired Moderator, PEGym Hero
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction score
272
Points
0
Location
Ohio
Again, it depends on your perspective.

When I was homeless, I was walking through the streets without a coat. Some guy stopped his truck and gave me the clothes off his back - literally. Didn't introduce himself, didn't stop to chat. Just saved my life and went off into the night.
There's good out there.
Yes, there IS bad out there.

But what you see most is where you choose to focus your attentions. Right now, it seems like you're focussing on the negatives out there.

+100

its always easier to notice something that you're already set on looking for.
There really is a good mix of "good" and "bad" people in the world, it is what it is. I know the bad is there, but rarely notice it because I choose not to.
 

Break

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
217
Reaction score
41
Points
0
+100

its always easier to notice something that you're already set on looking for.
There really is a good mix of "good" and "bad" people in the world, it is what it is. I know the bad is there, but rarely notice it because I choose not to.

yea but good and bad are only ideas humans made to better deal with their environment and their lives... they don't actually exist..

so here there is a peresupposition that someone that looks for positives is good and negatives is bad
change the context and lets see what happens

a venture capitalist analyzing a company....looking at negatives. that is looked as doing a good job.
especially when your money is being invested.

so a general synopsis of earth says were fucked... most of the species have gone extinct, overpopulation, lack of water, energy, etc sure i might just need to read the secret and visualize a better place but i don't think so.

you considered the act as good because it benefited you in a way...
what if you weren't homeless just dressed in a way that the guy thought you were, then you would consider his act judgmental and rude and ignorant for thinking of you as homeless.

So if good is defined in your mind as a someone else sacrificing for your benefit.
Good and Bad are labels used by churches, and cult leaders to inspire feelings of guilt, and punishment and to control others lives. They simply do not exist at all.

good and bad are general ideas,
break it down into its smaller components and you get selfishness and a lot of petty things that are summed up into the general ideas of GOOD and EVIL

why is it good? well he helped me... why did he help me? well his mirror neurons felt what it felt like to be you and he experienced empathy, so acting on empathy is good? what if you feel empathy for "god" so you decide to kill all the sinners...
were just animals.
And good and bad are societally engineered to make us function better together. and to feel empowered over other groups of people....
Were good, but those people! they are BAD!
it makes everyone feel unified, morally superior, and better about their little lives.

were just unwitting subjects of social programming, explore your morality and youll find most of it is unjustified and nonsensical
is it Bad to steal another mans woman?
no
Is it bad to steal another mans woman... but the man has cancer?
yes
is it bad for a woman to cheat?
yes
is it bad that humans have many desires and may want to act on more than one?
no
is it bad to kill?
yes
is it bad to kill the man that killed your family?
no
is it bad to steal?
yes
is it bad to steal to feed a dying child?
no

etc...
good quickly becomes bad and bad becomes good so you realize its all based on what helps you most or what perserves your self-value more.
 
Last edited:

donjelqer76

Retired Moderator, PEGym Hero
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
6,578
Reaction score
272
Points
0
Location
Ohio
Yes, good and bad are just ideals in ones own mind. I live in my own reality, and I'm happy for it (regardless as to whether I view anything specifically as good or bad). I've seen others that live in their own reality, and they're miserable. Everyone has the right to live in their own reality and interpret the world as they see fit - it doesn't affect my reality one bit. The problem comes when someone tries to push their own reality off as fact, or tries to push it off on other people.

I respect that you have your own view, fine by me. But trying to tell me that the way I view the world around me is wrong isn't going to get anywhere because I simply don't let others influence the way I think or feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigO

Break

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
217
Reaction score
41
Points
0
Yes, good and bad are just ideals in ones own mind. I live in my own reality, and I'm happy for it (regardless as to whether I view anything specifically as good or bad). I've seen others that live in their own reality, and they're miserable. Everyone has the right to live in their own reality and interpret the world as they see fit - it doesn't affect my reality one bit. The problem comes when someone tries to push their own reality off as fact, or tries to push it off on other people.

I respect that you have your own view, fine by me. But trying to tell me that the way I view the world around me is wrong isn't going to get anywhere because I simply don't let others influence the way I think or feel.


true but here again: when it comes to peoples philosophies good- sticking to ones own reality, bad- attempting to influence

but when it comes to trying to get a friend to quit doing drugs you get the opposite. its bad to not attempt to influence them toward being clean
point being the most powerful people form their own value systems, ideals, realities based off of science... measuring and testing and seeing actual cause effect patterns . The commmons/sheep of society have pre-installed value systems where good=being an obedient consumer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.