Penis size and standard deviation

[NewChamp]

I sort of agree with this. I'm around 7.5 BPEL but with around a 1" fat pad that makes me around 6.5-6.6 NBPEL. I know if I ram it home it would likely feel big, but it doesn't look big to me. For reference, I'm also 5'8" and about 167 lbs.

This is also one of the reasons I am shooting for hopefully 8" BPEL length by 2016 and at least 8.5 BPEL overall. That would put me at 7-7.5" NBPEL, and I'm pretty sure that would be seen as big/endowed by all.

Yeah 7 NBPEL looks large. So whatever produces that is great. I'm surprised you have 1 inch of fat pad. I'm also 5'8 but I've slacked and slipped up in weight and now have a stupid fat pad there. When I was down to 174 a couple of years ago I had very little fat there. I know people's bodies are different though. Maybe you have less muscle. I'd love to be 167 again. That's been a super long time. Well really most of the weight I put on in the pas 7 months. Grrr...It was fun but now that it's getting warm outside, I want to get it off.

I just want my 7 NBPEL. I know BPEL is helpful for accuracy and medical research but that stuff doesn't make me feel better. Oh it's longer but covered up. Who cares? LOL Just give e my 7 on the outside and I'm thrilled. You only have 0.4 to go. Congrats.

 

[NewChamp]

I sort of agree with this. I'm around 7.5 BPEL but with around a 1" fat pad that makes me around 6.5-6.6 NBPEL. I know if I ram it home it would likely feel big, but it doesn't look big to me. For reference, I'm also 5'8" and about 167 lbs.

This is also one of the reasons I am shooting for hopefully 8" BPEL length by 2016 and at least 8.5 BPEL overall. That would put me at 7-7.5" NBPEL, and I'm pretty sure that would be seen as big/endowed by all.

Also it's been a while since I've checked my BPEL. I don;t have a ruler...only a tape measure so I don;t feel like attempting to push in with that. Next time I'm by 5 and below or the dollar store, I should pop in and get a ruler.

 

[Pegasus]

Ok so nbpel is a visual thing which a lot of guys are into, but a complicating factor . Standard pad seems to be half an inch to an inch on slim to normal size guys and upwards of an inch on chubby guys . Some guys carry it there and some don't though so a lot of individual vary . However lets say most women are used to seeing guys 5" nbpel to 5.5" nbpel or possibly a little less. The standard deviation would still be circa .75".

So taking 5.25" nbpel as average a 6" would be 1 standard deviation and 6.75 2 standard deviations. This assumes the girl is used to seeing slimish to average size guys and is based on 6 in being average bpel so is conservative .

 

[Pegasus]

To put that into context, 6.75" nbpel would conservatively be in the top couple %.

 

[NewChamp]

To put that into context, 6.75" nbpel would conservatively be in the top couple %.

Yeah true but who says it even has to follow a bell shaped curve perfectly?
I like the chart in the last study. I'll just use that. I won;t worry about SD.

The other problem with judging off what women say is women think guys are 6 or 6.5. Ask them. LOL When really that latest study showed it is really 5.18 or something like that BPEL. So when a woman sees a guy that is about what they are used to seeing which might be that 5 NBEL she will think that's 6 or 6.5. When she thinks it's a little bit bigger, she will say the guy is 7 inches. When it feel a lot bigger she will say he's like 8 inches! Those that say 10 inches, just don't believe them. At most they were looking at 8 inches. They thin being an inch off is OK. LOL They consider that close. So if they are telling you 7 and the guy was 6, they see nothing wrong with that. LOL

But yeah...NBPEL is the fun length you get to see. I appreciate the value of the BPEL and how it's more accurate (and needed to measure real gains) and not dependent on fat etc. but really who cares about what you can't see? "Oh honey...it's there. It's just hidden."

 

[Pegasus]

Actually a lot of women are off a full 2" so I would not worry about what they say size was at all.

 

[Pegasus]

Constantly surprises me that guys are less concerned with the length they can actually put to a woman( bpel) and more concerned with appearance (nbpel).

 

[Phoenix7672]

Constantly surprises me that guys are less concerned with the length they can actually put to a woman( bpel) and more concerned with appearance (nbpel).

Well like I said before, if you hit a length where you can't go all in anymore, then NBPEL becomes more important so to speak. For example, if the make she can take is 7" and you're 8" BPEL, then it becomes more about making it look bigger as it is already functionally too big.

From most of what I've seen here and elsewhere, anyone who gets to above 7.5-8" NBPEL probably has a BPEL too long to go all in with most women, so to speak.

 

[MichaelJackson]

Constantly surprises me that guys are less concerned with the length they can actually put to a woman( bpel) and more concerned with appearance (nbpel).

You can't discount the way it works on a woman's mind, my friend, especially nowadays with all the emphasis on size in popular culture.

 

[Pegasus]

Actually it seems to be more the way it works in a mans mind .

 

[Pegasus]

Note that a 10 " penis is over 1 in 3 million so few women will ever experience one.

 

[Pegasus]

I think this bares repeating given the ongoing popularity of bigger dick ex stories.

 

[Pegasus]

Ok so to put this thread into context here is a post we got from a member some time ago .

Quote.
My girl friend has only slept with 7 guys including me. I am the only one under 10 inches. Currently 7.3 in. Can any one help me gain 3 inches in a year?

Seriously bummed. Could use some encouragement.

 

[Phoenix7672]

Ok so to put this thread into context here is a post we got from a member some time ago .

Quote.
My girl friend has only slept with 7 guys including me. I am the only one under 10 inches. Currently 7.3 in. Can any one help me gain 3 inches in a year?

Seriously bummed. Could use some encouragement.

Subtract the standard 2, and she'd be extremely lucky, but still within reason.

 

[Pegasus]

Subtract the standard 2, and she'd be extremely lucky, but still within reason.

Actually even if you subtract the standard 2" the odds against that are stupendous , some maths genius can work it out if they like but straight off the top of my head i can tell you it is waaaaayyyy over a million to one.

 

[Pegasus]

Just had a thought . I have a 8in plus bpel so around 3 standard deviations yay me so that is in the top % or 2. But hang on a minute what about other stuff like girth and flacid ? H

Hmm so I have not wanted to push my girth up since the wife doesn't like it . So I have been trying to gain length without girth which I have found difficult . However my flacid has got long consistently between 6 and 7in bone pressed .
So I theory average flacid is circa 3.5in with a sd of circa .5 . So hang on that would put me circa 5 sd over average ! Is that possible !!!

 

[Pegasus]

My intution is given that stuff I have seen etc I would be more like 4 visual SD . So my fat pad is circa an inch and that comes into it.

 

[Aussie452]

Ok so to put this thread into context here is a post we got from a member some time ago .

Quote.
My girl friend has only slept with 7 guys including me. I am the only one under 10 inches.

Sounds like that girl should buy a lotto ticket, being able to beat the odds like that lol

 

[Pegasus]

Sounds like that girl should buy a lotto ticket, being able to beat the odds like that lol

She would win many lottery in a row if she could replicate.

 

[Physdoc]

Hmm so I have not wanted to push my girth up since the wife doesn't like it . So I have been trying to gain length without girth which I have found difficult.

Same here. My gf liked my girth the way it was at 5.8” when I started PE. So, all I do is extending because the studies I’ve read say just extending works for length and not so much for girth. My results bear that out - length gains and no girth gains.