Cut or Uncut?
- Thread starter closed207
- Start date
I got circumcised when I was 30. I don’t think that there is not much difference in sensation during sex. I’ve found that the biggest difference is in hygiene (I feel much cleaner now).
Funny.. ive never had any hygeine problems.. as long as you shower everyday your fine.. ya just pull the skin back and wash it.. pretty easy. Either way you can please a women.. but I see no need to cut part of someones dick off lol.
from what i have heard from friends , cut gives a little less excitement because u dont feel the same stretch when u enter in... anyway i think about cutting myself for one reason.. sometimes i get an accident (especially when performing anal) and i mean the over-stretch of the rope-thing than connects the skin with the glans (im not so good at english so i try my best to make clear what i wanna say
)
anyway i think that size matters 95% and 5% matters being cut/uncut ... and to some women its the same beng cut or not...
so lets keep up the good work!
anyway i think that size matters 95% and 5% matters being cut/uncut ... and to some women its the same beng cut or not...
so lets keep up the good work!
NP97
Retired ModeratorPEGym Hero
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,896
- Reaction score
- 214
- Points
- 0
from what i have heard from friends , cut gives a little less excitement because u dont feel the same stretch when u enter in... anyway i think about cutting myself for one reason.. sometimes i get an accident (especially when performing anal) and i mean the over-stretch of the rope-thing than connects the skin with the glans (im not so good at english so i try my best to make clear what i wanna say)
anyway i think that size matters 95% and 5% matters being cut/uncut ... and to some women its the same beng cut or not...
so lets keep up the good work!
Actually size matters 0%. Who you are and how you use it is what really matters.
I have experienced both cut and uncut, and to me it makes no difference during sex/intercourse. I've never noticed any difference in sliding motion.
I still think cut looks better, and I like better to perform oral sex on a circumcised penis .... and agree that circumcised feels cleaner.
I still think cut looks better, and I like better to perform oral sex on a circumcised penis .... and agree that circumcised feels cleaner.
yes mostly its just inside our minds, but wouldnt it be better if the same man with the same skills to have a bigger dick ?
Do your research, look at BOTH sides of this issue.
Ask JAson on here, he recently got cut, YET now he's is looking at buying the same device that I currently use to GET IT BACK.
This>>> DTR
Anyway, I have done a hell of a lot of research on this, and for those that were cut as an infant and have never known the difference in having ALL those Meissner's Corpuscles, then they just don't know.
Kinda like if you had only ever watched a black and white TV, and it cost a great great deal of money to watch a Color TV, then you'd be likely to say, "fuck it, what I have is fine".
However, the OTHER part of some of my research has to do with men who got cut later in life and to my knowledge, 99% are ALWAYS BITTERLY UNHAPPY WITH THEIR "NEW" "CUT" DICKS!!!!!!!!!
I feel really bad for these guys and I have done some counseling for them and provided them with options.
Now there is a company in Italy called Foregen that is soon looking to do regeneration of males true genetic foreskin via stem cell research.
This is good.
Ask JAson on here, he recently got cut, YET now he's is looking at buying the same device that I currently use to GET IT BACK.
This>>> DTR
Anyway, I have done a hell of a lot of research on this, and for those that were cut as an infant and have never known the difference in having ALL those Meissner's Corpuscles, then they just don't know.
Kinda like if you had only ever watched a black and white TV, and it cost a great great deal of money to watch a Color TV, then you'd be likely to say, "fuck it, what I have is fine".
However, the OTHER part of some of my research has to do with men who got cut later in life and to my knowledge, 99% are ALWAYS BITTERLY UNHAPPY WITH THEIR "NEW" "CUT" DICKS!!!!!!!!!
I feel really bad for these guys and I have done some counseling for them and provided them with options.
Now there is a company in Italy called Foregen that is soon looking to do regeneration of males true genetic foreskin via stem cell research.
This is good.
Last edited:
For me, uncut all the way. I went with one uncut guy but he kept himself very clean. I was able to handle him in that case.
i'm willing to bet that when a guy asks his partner her preferance on the issue, she will almost always pick the way his is. if he is cut she will say she like cut ones better and vice versa. for most it probably makes little difference, as you usually cant even tell the difference visually when they are being used. literally all of the girls that i ever had that conversation with claim to have liked circumcised better. I'm circumcised. guys probably have a lot stronger opinions on the subject.
EDIT: it's also worth noting that one of my partners dated an uncircumcised guy and they couldn't have sex. he couldn't fully retract his foreskin because it was too tight, he had it treated, but it was still very painful. She couldn't even give him oral. this probably happens in less than one percent of men.
EDIT: it's also worth noting that one of my partners dated an uncircumcised guy and they couldn't have sex. he couldn't fully retract his foreskin because it was too tight, he had it treated, but it was still very painful. She couldn't even give him oral. this probably happens in less than one percent of men.
Last edited:
I can kinda agree with this. But there IS always, what I call, the "American Vegetable Eater" effect, which is:
A fair amount of Americans (and others too around the world I presume, but after much traveling, its mostly an American thing) that don't like vegetables simply because they have not had vegetables PREPARED in a way that they "enjoy".
There is a guy here now that is currently considering using a device just like we use for FR that is proven to treat and fix phimosis. I think training and stretching is a far better option than amputation.
Thats a good thought, the vegetable thing. i think also too, many girls have accidentally hurt a guys ego by not preferring him in some way. after doing this once they realize that they need to be delicate in these situations and they know subconciously or maybe fully conciously that to not like his way best would hurt his ego. if that make any sense. its like not telling a girl shes fat.
There are probably pluses and minuses to both for the girl..
Oral is probably nicer on a cut dick.. or easier..
Intercourse vaginally and anally is probably easier with a natural dick..
I saw this anal sex instructional video the other day.. and they had couples having sex, and the chick said she likes having anal with this guy because hes natural and the sliding motion makes things easier..
makes total sense.. especially for anal.. who wants something rough being jammed in n out down there.. much better to have a sliding motion.. same with sex..
But its probably a bigger deal to men then women.. my girl seemed to like my natural penis.. but she said when we first hooked up she didnt even notice.. my foreskin goes all the way back anyway, so it doesnt look THAT much different from a cut guy, except when flaccid of course.
To me its not a question which is "better".. to me its about nature. nature intended for us to be a certain way, I dont think its right to change that. I believe nature makes the right choice and humans make the wrong choice. Any girl who says she "prefers" a cut dick, has just become used to it from porn, western society, and experiencing a lot of cut dicks.. thats like a guy saying.. i love my girlfriends fake breasts..
You know in the middle east they clip a girls clitoris .. and we view that as barbaric.. yet we do the same to our boys and no one bats an eye.. funny
Oral is probably nicer on a cut dick.. or easier..
Intercourse vaginally and anally is probably easier with a natural dick..
I saw this anal sex instructional video the other day.. and they had couples having sex, and the chick said she likes having anal with this guy because hes natural and the sliding motion makes things easier..
makes total sense.. especially for anal.. who wants something rough being jammed in n out down there.. much better to have a sliding motion.. same with sex..
But its probably a bigger deal to men then women.. my girl seemed to like my natural penis.. but she said when we first hooked up she didnt even notice.. my foreskin goes all the way back anyway, so it doesnt look THAT much different from a cut guy, except when flaccid of course.
To me its not a question which is "better".. to me its about nature. nature intended for us to be a certain way, I dont think its right to change that. I believe nature makes the right choice and humans make the wrong choice. Any girl who says she "prefers" a cut dick, has just become used to it from porn, western society, and experiencing a lot of cut dicks.. thats like a guy saying.. i love my girlfriends fake breasts..
You know in the middle east they clip a girls clitoris .. and we view that as barbaric.. yet we do the same to our boys and no one bats an eye.. funny
Ok dude, this part in particular touched a nerve.
AS someone whose parents are from the middle east, & who has been there to visit, & who is still has her cultural roots, I will tell you, NO female genital mutilation is NOT done regularly in the middle east. It is considered a horrible thing & illegal in MANY of the countries there [ & around the world .] & Considered entirely FORBIDDEN & HARAM [ a sin to do ] by the religious leaders.
Female Genital Mutilation is most prevalent in AFRICA.
Also, one can not compare Female Genital Mutilation to Male Circumcision. Female Genital Mutilation would be comparable to, at the very least, removing a guy's PENIS, NOT his foreskin.
So please, get your facts straight before spreading information around that is false, it can be highly offensive to some of us reading, one being me.
Have a good day. ~
Last edited:
Calm down everyone!
@Leviathan- I think he meant Africa. Also, I wouldn't say that (with regard to Female Genital Mutilation) its comparable to cutting off the entire penis. Actually moxsum is RIGHT.
Why?.................well, just because the clit is removed in such a procedure doesn't mean that the female can't have sex or reproduce.
It just means that they receive less pleasure from sex. Same thing with the male foreskin. Sure, you can have sex and reproduce, but natural benefits and pleasure as nature intended is diminished.
I just don't see why, of all the "whacking" on bodies we do in the world, that we do this to tiny baby boys just hours old? Disgusting.
moxsum is right when he points out that people FREAK OUT about female circs, but male circs are "just great!"
EWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Leviathan- I think he meant Africa. Also, I wouldn't say that (with regard to Female Genital Mutilation) its comparable to cutting off the entire penis. Actually moxsum is RIGHT.
Why?.................well, just because the clit is removed in such a procedure doesn't mean that the female can't have sex or reproduce.
It just means that they receive less pleasure from sex. Same thing with the male foreskin. Sure, you can have sex and reproduce, but natural benefits and pleasure as nature intended is diminished.
I just don't see why, of all the "whacking" on bodies we do in the world, that we do this to tiny baby boys just hours old? Disgusting.
moxsum is right when he points out that people FREAK OUT about female circs, but male circs are "just great!"
EWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I started restoring my foreskin a few years ago. My wife never had sex with an intact guy. She knew I was restoring, but we never talked about it much. One evening as we were getting it on she told me I felt "different." She said that it felt more comfortable as I was pumping away and she like it, whatever it was. I did not prompt her nor guide her in getting her opinion.
As I continued restoring my foreskin and it grew longer, we stopped needing to use lube and she stopped getting sore from sex. She is also very vocal during sex and I noticed that she started making different noises at different times. After I started restoring she also started having vaginal orgasms, not all the time, but more than before. Based on the way she is acting during sex, I think she enjoys my restored foreskin more than she did before I started restoring.
She also says she enjoys sex more with a foreskin than without. But, as noted previously, there may be some reluctance for her to say otherwise. I think her reactions during sex, though, says that she prefers a guy with foreskin.
PS: I much prefer sex with a foreskin. I have full sensitivity and the gliding action is something that adds a new dimension to sex.
As I continued restoring my foreskin and it grew longer, we stopped needing to use lube and she stopped getting sore from sex. She is also very vocal during sex and I noticed that she started making different noises at different times. After I started restoring she also started having vaginal orgasms, not all the time, but more than before. Based on the way she is acting during sex, I think she enjoys my restored foreskin more than she did before I started restoring.
She also says she enjoys sex more with a foreskin than without. But, as noted previously, there may be some reluctance for her to say otherwise. I think her reactions during sex, though, says that she prefers a guy with foreskin.
PS: I much prefer sex with a foreskin. I have full sensitivity and the gliding action is something that adds a new dimension to sex.
Sorry, but female circ, as the term is being used here, is simply a distortion of terminology, used by some in their argument against male circumcision. We all know that circumcision involves the removal/modification of the foreskin. The equivalent anatomical part on females is the clitoral prepuce, the hood which partly surrounds the glans clitoris.
But when we discuss FGM, we're usually talking about MUCH more than simply removal/modification of the clitoral prepuce. In some cases, FGM involves the wholesale removal of almost all external female genitalia.
Comparing female circumcision, in the context of FGM, to male circumcision, this is simply an erroneous statement. This is a kind of inaccurate position staked out by those in the debate that are against male circumcision, and want to undercut the positions of those they are arguing against.
Our forums are excellent places where people share their knowledge and experiences. It would be great if we could just discuss this matter without making inaccurate statements just to win debate points.
it would be more like removing the entirety of the glans actually. you would still be able to have sex and reproduce, but without the head of your penis it would be much different. female circumcision is not the appropriate term.
Dash- Ok well let's compare the reasoning behind FGM and male circumcision? With no truly conclusive studies saying it helps in prevention of STI's, and omitting religious motives, it's for purely aesthetic reasons. It is simply removing a functional piece of the male anatomy that is there for a reason, usually with the individual having little choice. Furthermore putting infants only days old at risk of infection because on this unnecessary surgery, I've read reports of children dying because of it. And if these boys had kept their foreskin and 'worst case scenario' had phimosis in later life, well I've managed a good few years with it and I won't be cutting into mine anytime soon, a little stretching is getting me there.
Sad thing is my dad was circumcised relatively young because his foreskin 'wouldn't retract', despite the fact that at such a young age foreskins aren't usually able to retract doctors were likely eager to do the procedure, while he had no say in whether he wanted to keep a piece of his pee-pee. And so I was never educated on such matters and I never experimented pulling mine back, contributing to my phimosis. Education on the matter is the fix, not circumcision. Just as education on safe sex is the way to reduce spreading of STI's, not circumcision.
You say female 'circumcision' is an inaccurate term because of the extent of it is much more than on males. But is male circumcision still not mutilation? Without looking up Webster's definition I would still say it is. I actually agree that there probably is a significant difference between surgery on males and females, but I stan by my point that it's pointless in both cases.
Regards, Aidan.
Ps: Here's hoping my Dad's not a lurker on these forums ha!
Even though I suppose I could introduce him to FR, somehow I think that'd be a weird conversaton!
Sad thing is my dad was circumcised relatively young because his foreskin 'wouldn't retract', despite the fact that at such a young age foreskins aren't usually able to retract doctors were likely eager to do the procedure, while he had no say in whether he wanted to keep a piece of his pee-pee. And so I was never educated on such matters and I never experimented pulling mine back, contributing to my phimosis. Education on the matter is the fix, not circumcision. Just as education on safe sex is the way to reduce spreading of STI's, not circumcision.
You say female 'circumcision' is an inaccurate term because of the extent of it is much more than on males. But is male circumcision still not mutilation? Without looking up Webster's definition I would still say it is. I actually agree that there probably is a significant difference between surgery on males and females, but I stan by my point that it's pointless in both cases.
Regards, Aidan.
Ps: Here's hoping my Dad's not a lurker on these forums ha!
Even though I suppose I could introduce him to FR, somehow I think that'd be a weird conversaton!
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,795
- Reaction score
- 490
- Points
- 0
I have never been with a foreskin intact man, I have found with cut guys the hook on the head can cause a bit of ouch depending on the size of the penis, the head shape and how hard the erection is oh and the thrust duration.
I think visually, cut penis appeals a little more, because that is what I am use to seeing, it also what tends to be represented in both art and the media ..When i was studying art every nude model was cut, all of the drawing references were of cut penises. I have also noticed when people draw a penis its always with a very defined head.. so visually i am still adjusting to what flaccid non cut penis looks like. That said when a penis is erect i think visually cut or not it makes little difference.
I am not for circumcision on children regardless of sex, but whether or not a man is cut does not change my attraction to his penis, because when I decide I like someone i have no idea what he is packing.. when the pants come off i am pretty much already invested into the person.. so the size of his penis and or the style doesn't matter... and I would like to believe men feel the same way about my pussy ..hahaha
I think visually, cut penis appeals a little more, because that is what I am use to seeing, it also what tends to be represented in both art and the media ..When i was studying art every nude model was cut, all of the drawing references were of cut penises. I have also noticed when people draw a penis its always with a very defined head.. so visually i am still adjusting to what flaccid non cut penis looks like. That said when a penis is erect i think visually cut or not it makes little difference.
I am not for circumcision on children regardless of sex, but whether or not a man is cut does not change my attraction to his penis, because when I decide I like someone i have no idea what he is packing.. when the pants come off i am pretty much already invested into the person.. so the size of his penis and or the style doesn't matter... and I would like to believe men feel the same way about my pussy ..hahaha
