just curious about this.ive really got no depth but im all width and my girth is 5.75.what are most guys width or depth?
width or depth ?
- Thread starter ripped128806
- Start date
Judging by this place it seems to be width (girth). It seems 5.5 girth is the average here. My girth sucks.
NP97
Retired ModeratorPEGym Hero
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,896
- Reaction score
- 214
- Points
- 0
GTO
Retired Moderator, PEGym Editor, PEGym Hero
rbi99
Retired Mod, Member of the Month Nov 2017
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 348
- Points
- 103
When we talk about width and depth, are we talking about width = CC's, and depth = CS? If so, the problem (if you want to call it that) with CS development is that a well developed CS sticks out very pronouncedly, whereas well developed CC's are incorporated into the erect shaft smoothly. My CS is very well developed and because of that it does not make my unit look cylindrical at all. I would think if one is after a cylindrical "look", a less developed CS would be in order.
Some thoughts on CS development in my post bellow. Since this thread is about penis shape it seems appropriate.
Gonna add the importance in v jelqs for this is key!
https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-enlargement-forum/24329-sleeping-your-cock.html
Gonna add the importance in v jelqs for this is key!
https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-enlargement-forum/24329-sleeping-your-cock.html
Man, I have a well developed depth and only 4" girth. My width really suck.
Adding O-bend to routine now ...
Adding O-bend to routine now ...
rbi99
Retired Mod, Member of the Month Nov 2017
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 348
- Points
- 103
Since V jelqs hit the sides of your unit (CC's) more so than than the bottom of it (CS), regular jelqs or UJ's will do more to develop a pronounced CS than V's will.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 30,378
- Reaction score
- 3,466
- Points
- 133
- Location
- An inch and 1/2 deeper than before
I have more width than depth but not to much, pretty close to a tube shape but Im not interested in changing it yet.
Depth. Looks a bit thin from my view above!
From my time here it seems that a better looking width is a shade more common.
Rbi, what are your thoughts on tackling the CCs? Compared to the rest of me they seem tough as old boots! I've recently added a few of your UVJs to my routine (5 for every 20 regular V's) but am taking it slow as a precaution... so thanks so far!! Any thoughts on the matter in general? Cheers,
KK
From my time here it seems that a better looking width is a shade more common.
Rbi, what are your thoughts on tackling the CCs? Compared to the rest of me they seem tough as old boots! I've recently added a few of your UVJs to my routine (5 for every 20 regular V's) but am taking it slow as a precaution... so thanks so far!! Any thoughts on the matter in general? Cheers,
KK
Oh. I totally mis-interpreted the question. I have more width than depth. Both suck though considering this crowd.
MEG 5"
BEG 5.3"
MID WIDTH 1 5/8" maybe slightly wider
BASE WIDTH 1 3/4"
MEG 5"
BEG 5.3"
MID WIDTH 1 5/8" maybe slightly wider
BASE WIDTH 1 3/4"
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 316
- Points
- 0
rbi99
Retired Mod, Member of the Month Nov 2017
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 348
- Points
- 103
I think you can go straight to the UV's as your V jelq. If you develop your CS, it really stands out visually, but the CC's are pretty much incorporated into your shaft rather smoothly. Squeezes will help everything.
rbi99
Retired Mod, Member of the Month Nov 2017
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 348
- Points
- 103
She will definitely see a well developed CS, while she won't see your CC's, overall girth and hardness will let her know you are the man!!
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 316
- Points
- 0
