Recently, in addition to measuring my BPEL, BPFSL, and my EG, Ive also started measuring my what I like to call Erect width. I feel that personally this measurment is just as important as EG as far as keeping track of gains is concerned. Right now I measure just a hair above 1 1/4 across. I just wanted to know if anyone else includes erect width in thir measurments when taking measurments and keeping track of goals?
Erection Width
- Thread starter Wolfmesser
- Start date
Cool idea, but a hard measurement to make...Especially if you want to make a proper measurement in the middle (vertically)where you would be at the thickest. You could always put two light plastic cups on the edge of a table and simply push in between them (spreading them apart) and then afterward measure the distance between the cups. I am sure there are easier ways, but it would be hard to get an accurate reading just using a straight ruler from the top and a measure tape wouldn't work in this case.
Last edited:
You do bring up a point hockey_ny, especially since the angle you are measuring is 3 dimentianal, but Ive found that regardless, using a typical ruler does the job and the way I sually do it, is by tilting my head while measuring so that I can make each side of my shaft meet, its not the most accurate, but it gives a very good estimate.
You know Waylander, I never actually thought to use one of those lol, I think I might just invest in one of those for the most accruate measurment I can get, Thanks 
If you want it to be measured for your own personal knowledge, then i guess you could use Waylander's method, but if you just want to know your gains, i don't think it really matters how accurate you are, just the method you measure the width every time must be consistent.
GTO
Retired Moderator, PEGym Editor, PEGym Hero
That's how girth measurements are taken anyway. This is talking about the width.
RBI brings up a great point as well - some guys are deeper than they are wide and for some, it may vary at different points along the shaft. Like myself, while my CC is pretty developed and I have a good width, my CS is very pronounced and subsequently, my girth is pretty deep as well (not to mention the diff in base girth ...)
I had a really good PE session the other day and my dick was throbbing and felt so huge so i put my DirecTv controller under it. I don't know if I was having a good day or what, but it was almost the same width.
rbi99
Retired Mod, Member of the Month Nov 2017
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,073
- Reaction score
- 348
- Points
- 103
While a well developed CS stands out visually, its contribution to overall girth size is far less than what CC's contribute, not only because there are two CC's vs one CS, but each CC individually is larger than the CS. That being said, I don't plan on giving my CS back any time soon!!!!
It would be nice if, in the not too distant future when PE has become as mainstream as Fitness, that there will be a little gizmo that measures volume, penile girth, width and depth. Definatly would come in handy.
My width across is a tad over 2". Is that good?
I believe the measurement across (width) is more important than depth because it spreads the pussy out laterally. lol
I believe the measurement across (width) is more important than depth because it spreads the pussy out laterally. lol
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,338
- Reaction score
- 316
- Points
- 0
Wrong.
CC stands for Corpora Cavernosa, the two erectile bodies of the penis.
CS stands for Corpora Spongiosum, the erectile body on the ventral side of the penis which the uethra passes through.
Last edited:
