review on extender's what's your thoughts

cantwait

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Do penis extender really work?This is the half year review of my private study about penis extenders.Who would have thought that, after 6 months or roughly 530 wearing hours, I'm still willing to continue with the study to gain one inch in length of my erected penis by using a penis extender! But what inspires my enthusiasm? One thing is certainly; it is not the pain. I'm not belonging to this group of person that enjoys pain. If you look closer at the reports & picture gallery though it becomes clear what drives my motivation. It is curiosity combined with the success I've had so far.The initial idea for this study was to bust the myth that one can enlarge a human penis permanently. At the start I believed the whole penis extender thing is a big hoax and companies who are involved in promoting those devices need to be addressed and possibly shut down. Now I, the biggest skeptic, have to admit that this stretching method does work. I have the proof captured in photos saved in my picture gallery. The only thing I still need to answer: Is the gain permanently? This will be the subject of the second part of this study after I have reached my goal to gain one inch in length of my erected penis.Another assumption has been confirmed as well. I have read couple of articles about the theory of stretching penis tissues and tearing the outer membrane of cells apart. One thing that has been mentioned was that when a cell re-grows it does that in each direction as a cell is somehow circular. That means if I gain length of my penis I will automatically gain girth as well. Although girth obviously was not the centre of my attention, nevertheless my girlfriend noticed it many times that my penis looks and feels much bigger. I have to agree!
 

TomY

Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
205
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Six months and only 530 hours of use? I'm wearing this thing almost half the day every day. But then again I tend to obsess...
 

rhinoguy

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
445
Reaction score
36
Points
48
Location
ne
Who cares? Why do you keep cutting and pasting crap like this? I told you on that other thread what articles were authoritative on the subject of penis extender research and what you should be worried about yet it appears that went in one ear and out the other. You apparently did not read them. Did you even try to read them? Here you are back 4 days later posting garbage articles again from god knows where and asking the same doubtful questions as though nothing ever happened the last 45 times you asked. You either aren't sincere or more than likely, you are completely unable to determine or decide what a good source on this subject is. In the meantime you keep clipping garbage from somewhere and making us read it.
 

cantwait

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Who cares? Why do you keep cutting and pasting crap like this? I told you on that other thread what articles were authoritative on the subject of penis extender research and what you should be worried about yet it appears that went in one ear and out the other. You apparently did not read them. Did you even try to read them? Here you are back 4 days later posting garbage articles again from god knows where and asking the same doubtful questions as though nothing ever happened the last 45 times you asked. You either aren't sincere or more than likely, you are completely unable to determine or decide what a good source on this subject is. In the meantime you keep clipping garbage from somewhere and making us read it.

you are trip man, why so upset just wanna know what the people fill or is thinking about these article. trust me it make a diff just cause you dont see it dont mean its not helpful. ps im not making anybody read anything. nice to know what you think about it tho.
 

rhinoguy

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
445
Reaction score
36
Points
48
Location
ne
They are not scientific, that's what I think about them. They are just some dudes ramblings with no qualification other than he feels like rambling on the internet. What do you think about them? Are you going to make a decision on how to do PE based on some guy rambling somewhere? You are not showing enough critical thinking, I wish you would only clips things from people with at least some authority. We can talk about what is an "authoritative source" if you like- great topic- but you appear to accept literally anything as it is and that is what annoys me about the articles you paste here all the time.
 

cantwait

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Points
0
They are not scientific, that's what I think about them. They are just some dudes ramblings with no qualification other than he feels like rambling on the internet. What do you think about them? Are you going to make a decision on how to do PE based on some guy rambling somewhere? You are not showing enough critical thinking, I wish you would only clips things from people with at least some authority. We can talk about what is an "authoritative source" if you like- great topic- but you appear to accept literally anything as it is and that is what annoys me about the articles you paste here all the time.


some time those people have some light of truth to it even if he is just rambling you have to think he is rambling for a reason that the critical thinking. ever heard that saying even the truth can come from a fool mouth. i read clips from authoriative but some time you wanna go with a smaller source even tho with the lack of creditability. sometime payless is just as good as nike. but whatever make you happy we can disscuss whatever however just want to get the job done but frist checking any and all resources.
 

rhinoguy

Registered
Well Done !
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
445
Reaction score
36
Points
48
Location
ne
Ok what I am getting from you is that you can't tell what a good source is and one which isn't any good. You will go and grab any random schlock you come across by googling "penis extenders" and sure enough all kinds of garbage comes back. And sure as can be, you appear totally confused about PE. And that is exactly why using quality sources for information is so essential.

I have no problem discussing articles from the web in general but you are showing me you have no idea what makes for good reading and what doesn't. Since you do not know a good article when you find one, you come here and post the rubbish you find and ask us what to think. But the problem is not what we think, it is why you can't find good articles to paste here.

Here are a few things you should look for in any article on PE.

1. Is the author an authority on their subject? For example, are they a medical professional or an established expert of some kind?

2. Is the website a well-known one? Large, established, trusted websites are places like Wikipedia, CNN, WebMD, Breitbart, you know what they look like. They are not obscure websites here today gone tomorrow.

3. Do the articles cite any sources or references for what they are claiming? I have yet to see a source on anything you pasted here. Citations are the hallmark of good research and well written articles. You need to see citations on your articles. They may be listed at the bottom or mentioned in text of the article, but no citations = junk article.

4. When an article makes a claim then says the proof is shown here or here, how good is the source it then refers you to? Do they make claims based on good sources or just some other shabby website like theirs? Do they refer to peer reviewed research from major universities? You can tell what a good source is, you have this list to help you.

5. As far as whether PE works or not there is not a heck of a lot of research on it because it costs a lot of money to do research and unless the topic has medical significance then it is unlikely to get funded. PE certainly has some medical relevance but PE for cosmetic application, which is what most of us are doing here at PEGym, does not. We are lucky in that a few high quality studies have been done to see whether penis extenders work on penis diseases like short penis and bent penis. These studies are useful because they show a high chance (certainty) that using a penis extender can help cosmetic purposes as it helps treat those diseases. So while we may only have a handful of published studies on penis extenders and even less on other forms of PE, those are by far and away the best sources on whether PE works because they use rigorous methods to decide whether the results are valid.

Please try and use your head about what you are reading. You are choosing poor sources, confusing yourself with the stuff you read, and annoying us here who have to answer the same questions over and again when you paste it here and ask whether it is any good or not.
 
Last edited:

cantwait

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Ok what I am getting from you is that you can't tell what a good source is and one which isn't any good. You will go and grab any random schlock you come across by googling "penis extenders" and sure enough all kinds of garbage comes back. And sure as can be, you appear totally confused about PE. And that is exactly why using quality sources for information is so essential.

I have no problem discussing articles from the web in general but you are showing me you have no idea what makes for good reading and what doesn't. Since you do not know a good article when you find one, you come here and post the rubbish you find and ask us what to think. But the problem is not what we think, it is why you can't find good articles to paste here.

Here are a few things you should look for in any article on PE.

1. Is the author an authority on their subject? For example, are they a medical professional or an established expert of some kind?

2. Is the website a well-known one? Large, established, trusted websites are places like Wikipedia, CNN, WebMD, Breitbart, you know what they look like. They are not obscure websites here today gone tomorrow.

3. Do the articles cite any sources or references for what they are claiming? I have yet to see a source on anything you pasted here. Citations are the hallmark of good research and well written articles. You need to see citations on your articles. They may be listed at the bottom or mentioned in text of the article, but no citations = junk article.

4. When an article makes a claim then says the proof is shown here or here, how good is the source it then refers you to? Do they make claims based on good sources or just some other shabby website like theirs? Do they refer to peer reviewed research from major universities? You can tell what a good source is, you have this list to help you.

5. As far as whether PE works or not there is not a heck of a lot of research on it because it costs a lot of money to do research and unless the topic has medical significance then it is unlikely to get funded. PE certainly has some medical relevance but PE for cosmetic application, which is what most of us are doing here at PEGym, does not. We are lucky in that a few high quality studies have been done to see whether penis extenders work on penis diseases like short penis and bent penis. These studies are useful because they show a high chance (certainty) that using a penis extender can help cosmetic purposes as it helps treat those diseases. So while we may only have a handful of published studies on penis extenders and even less on other forms of PE, those are by far and away the best sources on whether PE works because they use rigorous methods to decide whether the results are valid.

Please try and use your head about what you are reading. You are choosing poor sources, confusing yourself with the stuff you read, and annoying us here who have to answer the same questions over and again when you paste it here and ask whether it is any good or not.

ask yourself this you have none of those things going for you but if you just wanted to post something to let people know what you have done and seen from pe, pumping, extenders etc. but because you are not quote of quote a reasonable source, now your lieing and full of it but does that change the fact about what you said what you seen or gain. now i do agree with you on some of the article on the net but like i told you before its a reason i read them and you should to. At the end of day knowbody knows who tellin the truth not them, you, me or knowone on this site. sometimes the little man can help you get to were you wanna go and know what you wanna know.you know sometime these authority source is just as full of it to. but to end this we are all poor sources im not the only one who should use his head here. good luck on your journey.