I just started lifting weights again almost 2 months ago. Through out the years I have been exercising off and on, mostly off though and when I would I wouldn't be consistent. I am stating all this to give a better understanding where I am at. I am 28 years old, 6'2", 220 lbs., with 21% body fat. I can lose 10-20lbs. of body fat mass, but that isn't what I need help on. My question is as far as weight training, is it better to go for strength or hypertrophy first?
My plan is to gain in strength/muscle mass, would it be more effective to train in hypertrophy after finishing a cycle of a strength program? To me this sounds effective because you make strength gains as best as possible, and afterward when you start training in hypertrophy you will get your muscle gains waay quicker since you are stronger and able to push more weight. What would it be like the other way around though? would it be smarter or even more effective? To get big first then strong instead?
I am going to school to become a personal trainer, the teachers are by the book when it comes to a lot of principles, and they don't know alot about new training methods, especially resistance training. Right now I designed myself a 3 day a week split weight training program where I am hitting back and chest, Biceps triceps & forearms, legs and shoulders, on different days, doing 4 sets of 6-10 reps to failure, 2:30 minute rest between sets, and 2-3 exercises per muscle group. I am unsure as to follow this for strength training first or to design more of a hypertrophy program and follow that first. Again, my goals are both strength and hypertrophy. What do you guys think?
My plan is to gain in strength/muscle mass, would it be more effective to train in hypertrophy after finishing a cycle of a strength program? To me this sounds effective because you make strength gains as best as possible, and afterward when you start training in hypertrophy you will get your muscle gains waay quicker since you are stronger and able to push more weight. What would it be like the other way around though? would it be smarter or even more effective? To get big first then strong instead?
I am going to school to become a personal trainer, the teachers are by the book when it comes to a lot of principles, and they don't know alot about new training methods, especially resistance training. Right now I designed myself a 3 day a week split weight training program where I am hitting back and chest, Biceps triceps & forearms, legs and shoulders, on different days, doing 4 sets of 6-10 reps to failure, 2:30 minute rest between sets, and 2-3 exercises per muscle group. I am unsure as to follow this for strength training first or to design more of a hypertrophy program and follow that first. Again, my goals are both strength and hypertrophy. What do you guys think?
Last edited:

