New study shows real penis lentgh!!!! Must seee! :0
- Thread starter jcwhs7
- Start date
Posted already.
However, I did think it clever that to receive correct measurements, the data-collecting office promised to hand out free condoms that were fitted to the size reported. Smart incentive.
However, I did think it clever that to receive correct measurements, the data-collecting office promised to hand out free condoms that were fitted to the size reported. Smart incentive.
I dont believe I actually think the old studies are out dated I firmly believe world wide average length is over six just my opinion
If the study was done as described in this article should be reliable. Measurements made with criteria, standards and the same conditions are always more correct and accurate. I've read many articles commenting on the static size of the penis are made only by the measures reported by men who do not have the same criteria and sometimes increased slightly lol.
The smallest was 1.5 inches! I couldn't imagine. I'm sorry if there is someone here at that size. I can't imagine doing PE is even possible at that size. It would have to be all glands.
im sure there are plenty of those... although they must be pretty rare as well, but they exist!
I think this can be quite accurate. If this test was bpel then it can be possible, however, if it wasnt...then that would mean most people are over 6 inches nbp
The measurement was done on the underside of the penis which would more than compensate for bpel +...in fact I was shocked the average was so low when I read they used this method...my dick is well over 9 in measured from the underside and I feel there is more room to cheat this way so this actually reinforces the 5.6 in average as true.
How can I read the actual article? I want to know how they measured. 5.6" BPEL seems awfully small for an average.
Well, I don't know exactly but I do know it was not 10.2 inches along the top and many guys can pick up an inch or more along the bottom...but I think 8.5 is closer to the actual size. Penises above 8 inches fall off the statistical curve dramatically no matter how many internet 10 inches you've seen.
See the image at the already posted thread (https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-enlargement-forum/61727-new-study-size.html)
This has to be non bone pressed...
I don't know, PE has completely changed the way I look at size.
I don't know, PE has completely changed the way I look at size.
makes total sense, however, 5.6 seems too small to be bone pressed. think about it...that means most of the guys who participated where 4.5 nbp?? seems a bit on the low side for an average dont you think?
btw nice sig bro haha
All this really shows is that the previous data is in agreement with the current census on penis size which is give or take about 6 in length and about 5 in circumference.
All this shows me is how stupid these people were ... measuring the under side? Surely they've found out measuring the top is more accurate ... and undersides give inflated numbers .... I can measure close to 9 when doing under side ... stupid study people ... however it does do good in confirming past studies of about 5.7 x 4.8 is avg
