- Joined
- Oct 4, 2008
- Messages
- 218
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 0
I know alot of people love the big vein look, and I know many people say big veins are a product of PE (I beleive the term is manual angioplasty...where you use pressure to widen blood vessels).
I read about this somewhere, the theory was that that PE could be harmful to good errections due to enlarging the veins and the whole blood inflow outflow ratio. The theory was that PE which causes permenant enlarging of the veins could mean more blood is effectively taken out of the penis quicker than it can be put in, and that arteries can shrink down more when PE is stopped but that veins dont (and as most of you know Im sure-arteries pump blood in and veins drain it out), so the inflow outflow ratio is disrupted. I must state that this was (as in most cases with PE) a theory and certainly some people disagreed with it!
I just wondered what other people thought of this idea?
I personally am unsure of the validity of these claims, for one I do not know if it is as simple as blood being "sucked" out by veins or drained off during an errection because I read somewhere that when an errection takes place the tunica effectively inhibits blood outflow to the veins. I dont think the key to PE and a bigger penis is simply a stronger blood inflow than outflow, although I am sure that may well be a factor (and why kegals are so useful), but I also read that it was effectively the tunica which is the limiting factor in PE, and that this is quite a tough structure. I do accept that errection quality and indeed length varries, but before I PEed I could never exceed a certain length no matter how "good" an errection I got. It makes sense to me that there is a limiting factor other than blood flow.
I read about this somewhere, the theory was that that PE could be harmful to good errections due to enlarging the veins and the whole blood inflow outflow ratio. The theory was that PE which causes permenant enlarging of the veins could mean more blood is effectively taken out of the penis quicker than it can be put in, and that arteries can shrink down more when PE is stopped but that veins dont (and as most of you know Im sure-arteries pump blood in and veins drain it out), so the inflow outflow ratio is disrupted. I must state that this was (as in most cases with PE) a theory and certainly some people disagreed with it!
I just wondered what other people thought of this idea?
I personally am unsure of the validity of these claims, for one I do not know if it is as simple as blood being "sucked" out by veins or drained off during an errection because I read somewhere that when an errection takes place the tunica effectively inhibits blood outflow to the veins. I dont think the key to PE and a bigger penis is simply a stronger blood inflow than outflow, although I am sure that may well be a factor (and why kegals are so useful), but I also read that it was effectively the tunica which is the limiting factor in PE, and that this is quite a tough structure. I do accept that errection quality and indeed length varries, but before I PEed I could never exceed a certain length no matter how "good" an errection I got. It makes sense to me that there is a limiting factor other than blood flow.
Last edited: