- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 0
I've been Kegeling for about three months and I have noticed a difference in (1) my erection quality; (2) my ability to hold urine or squirt it out; (3) my ability to hold the muscles flexed. I have tried stopping the feeling of imminent ejaculation by flexing my BC while masturbating and have done it successfully. However, while I don't come at all, I sometimes lose my erection or hardness after doing this. It's like my body thinks that it came when it didn't. And I've noticed this with strong Kegeling in general while masturbating.
So far the Kegeling hasn't given me rock-hard erections, but I have seen a difference in the upward angle of my erection. And I'd say I can hold a relatively hard clench in my BC now for about twenty seconds. After fifteen seconds it doesn't feel as intense. And at thirty seconds, the clench is a lot weaker than at ten seconds. It's a lot easier to tightly clench the lower musculature along the perineum -- more the PC muscles than the BC, I guess.
I was wondering, though, if anybody has thought about objective standards for BC/PC strength. Obviously being able to flex harder and for longer is better than only being able to flex weakly for a few seconds, but where is the "Healthy" range and where is the "Optimal" range?
How have you known when your Kegels became as strong as they could be? Was it with the strength of long flexes? The number of quick flexes you could do? A substantial difference in erection quality?
How have you known if you're overtraining?
So far the Kegeling hasn't given me rock-hard erections, but I have seen a difference in the upward angle of my erection. And I'd say I can hold a relatively hard clench in my BC now for about twenty seconds. After fifteen seconds it doesn't feel as intense. And at thirty seconds, the clench is a lot weaker than at ten seconds. It's a lot easier to tightly clench the lower musculature along the perineum -- more the PC muscles than the BC, I guess.
I was wondering, though, if anybody has thought about objective standards for BC/PC strength. Obviously being able to flex harder and for longer is better than only being able to flex weakly for a few seconds, but where is the "Healthy" range and where is the "Optimal" range?
How have you known when your Kegels became as strong as they could be? Was it with the strength of long flexes? The number of quick flexes you could do? A substantial difference in erection quality?
How have you known if you're overtraining?